Hi Guys,

Just watched the recording of the session (really sorry I missed it, got
called away at the last minute). I've a couple of comments.

Firstly, thanks to all who took part. Despite a couple of glitches, I think
this is a really powerful way to expand the discussions we're having on the
list. As someone mentioned during the session, the list has limitations in
getting to the kernel of some questions, where it seems that a lot of that
was addressed in this medium.

It was really useful to have several people from Numenta/Grok present at
the same time, because we were able to get many contributions from the
different points of view practically simultaneously. I'm looking forward to
even higher bandwidth discussions during the hackathon.

I thought the discussions about hierarchy were very enlightening, and I
think this medium is great because you were talking about things we haven't
seen externally before. Until you have good answers, the information is all
in the questions, and especially the doubts that you expressed in the
session. We don't get to see that in Jeff's talks or in any publications,
for obvious reasons, but they're all-important for getting to the next
stages in the process.

Specifically related to the discussion about hierarchy, I have some
thoughts which might be of some use.

As you mentioned, you've temporarily stopped looking at hierarchy and are
concentrating on the usefulness of a single-region, single-layer CLA
implementation, and clearly that's working well.

Correct me if I'm wrong, Jeff, but it seems that we have all these
expensive layers (and complex structure within several of them) for a
reason: there's a lot more going on than just spatial pattern recognition
and sequence learning. The layers are performing different parts of the
computation, perhaps including:

1) Pure feature detection.
2) Sequence memory.
3) Using sequence memory to constrain feature detection.
4) Attention
5) Incorporation of signals from layers above
6) Motor stuff
7) Sending signals downwards in the hierarchy
8) Interaction with subcortical structures
9) Using the predictive cells
10) (nearly forgot!) sending signals upwards

[Numbers do not correspond to layer numbers! Just the order I thought of
them in].

The laminar structure exists in lots of places in the brain, but the huge
area of almost identical laminar cortex does not. We must have evolved the
neocortex by having a few very small hierarchies with few layers, and added
more complexity as we evolved from the shrew-like original mammals. So we
should seek (as Jeff said in the session) to build a very simple hierarchy
using just a couple of CLA regions first, and see how it behaves.

In the CLA, we might typically have 32 or 40 neurons per column. These are
all doing the same job. In the real cortex, we have many more than this.
Neurons are very expensive, so they must all be doing something useful.

I suggest that we should see how we can emulate some of this list of
functions in each CLA column, perhaps by "separating concerns" as the
pattern guys call it. If you look at the NuPIC code, you're already doing a
huge number of things which are not strictly included in the idealised
algorithm.

I'm on Ian's side in the debate about reconstruction. We are clearly able
to do generative "perceptions" based on top-down activations of high-level
concepts. As Jeff has identified, it takes a long time between knowing that
we should be able to do something and figuring out even one good way to do
it, so I'd say that we need to find out how we can do it. It could turn out
to be the key to understanding the whole idea of how hierarchies work, in
the same way that cell choice is the key to understanding how sequence
memory may work.

Delighted with the discussion, nuts that I missed it!

Regards,

Fergal Byrne



On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> I had some reports of people getting kicked out of the Google Hangout,
> unable to reconnect. Please report any issues you had to me so I can
> address them. We may want to switch to another conferencing technology if
> Hangout has issues. I don't want to exclude anyone.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ---------
> Matt Taylor
> OS Community Flag-Bearer
> Numenta
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hangout URL:
>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/d7fbbdde067c5ddb249c1c526473b2420ebc3519
>>
>> YouTube URL: http://youtu.be/MWBFw4WoZxA
>>
>> ---------
>> Matt Taylor
>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>> Numenta
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Reminder: this online event starts in 54 minutes.
>>>
>>> ---------
>>> Matt Taylor
>>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>>> Numenta
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Marek Otahal <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Matt, this is a great step!
>>>> I hope it'll get more knowledge sunken to the community.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Have questions about NuPIC or the CLA? Jeff and Subutai will be in
>>>>> attendance to help answer them in our first Open Office Hour at Grok.
>>>>> This event is focused on NuPIC and our open source community, but
>>>>> anyone is welcome to join and ask questions, or just discuss related
>>>>> technologies.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://plus.google.com/b/100642636108337517466/events/c2pt64fid2niuso3r4mp5n7u9os
>>>>>
>>>>> Please join in if you would like to chat. I'll be recording and
>>>>> streaming on YouTube. I will post the URL for the Hangout and the
>>>>> YouTube link here just before the event.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> Matt Taylor
>>>>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>>>>> Numenta
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: I know this time will not work for everyone interested in
>>>>> attending. For the next office hour, I will try to schedule a
>>>>> completely different time so others may attend.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nupic mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marek Otahal :o)
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nupic mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
>


-- 

Fergal Byrne

<http://www.examsupport.ie>Brenter IT
[email protected] +353 83 4214179
Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to