Patrick, your image will be very useful for explaining the encoder. I only
see one thing wrong - in the top half (current encoder) the top five rows
have 6 cells active instead of 5.

But even if we choose the first range randomly in the implementation I
think your image showing consecutive bits first makes it easier to
understand.


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Hawkins <[email protected]> wrote:

> Patrick,
> Yes, I think you have the idea captured in these very nice images.
>
> As I understand the images, the x-axis is a list of encoding bits.  The
> y-axis shows encodings of successively increasing scalar input values.
>
> In my original email, at the end, I suggested that in hind sight we could
> have just picked encoder bits randomly.  As you say, this would be cleaner
> and eliminate the strangeness of starting assigning coding bits one way and
> then switching to a different, random, method.  This would also reduce the
> possibility of having some edge condition as we switch from the first
> method
> to the second.
>
> I don't see why this would increase the number of possible combinations.
> Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nupic [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Patrick
> Higgins
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:04 AM
> To: NuPIC general mailing list.
> Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] new encoder idea
>
> Jeff,
>
> Does this look correct? If so I'll expand on it to make it more clear. I
> reduced it to 41 bits with 5 on bits for simplicity...
>
> Also, if this is correct, then why does the scaler encoder not just pick
> random bits for each SDR if the bits in the buckets do not need to adjacent
> to each other? Doing that would expand the number of possible combinations
> substantially and give the overall system consistency.
>
>
>
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to