Hi Dennis,

My mistake, yes, that's the right course.

Regards,

Fergal


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Dennis Stark <[email protected]> wrote:

> > The HTM is Jeff's over-arching theory of how the neocortex works. The
> CLA is a very detailed model (suitable for implementation in software right
> now) which describes how Layer 3 of a single region recognises spatial
> patterns and learns sequences of those patterns. The CLA (and NuPIC)
> encompasses three of the six principles of HTM, namely Sparse Distributed
> Representations, Online Learning, and Sequence Memory. Hierarchy, Attention
> and Motor Function are TBD right now!
> > Because of the lack of hierarchy in NuPIC, it cannot compete with other
> "some neuroscience" approaches such as Deep Belief Nets for applications
> such as yours. However, these other approaches lack the temporal sequence
> learning which is one of the core attributes of NuPIC.
>
> Thank you for the explanation! This is exactly why I'm writing a small
> library that enables hierarchy (c++ at the moment for speed). Basically I
> have created some code that is relatively fast and mimics CLA in some
> respect (I don't have dutyCycle watcher for boosting at the moment, and
> it's currently does only spacial pooling). The reason I do this to begin
> with, is for easier translation to GPU, and a little glitch of mine - for
> me it's much easier to write something myself then understand how a huge
> library works. It is only when I fail to achieve the result I turn back to
> the library, but by then I already understand everything.
>
> > For categorisation of static images, I would look at Geoff Hinton's work
> (he has a great, and free, course on Udemy). The system he describes looks
> very much like what you're doing.
>
> I found one on Coursera
> https://class.coursera.org/neuralnets-2012-001/lecture/index Is this the
> one? Looks like it has invaluable information there!
>
> > Time-based learning in NuPIC would involve providing a region with a
> varying input and have it learn the invariance. This would not be done by
> giving it a set of real-world, unrelated images, but perhaps by using 3D
> rendering software to feed it a realistic feed of successive, semantically
> consistent frames, just like what we get when we perceive the world. I
> still think we'll have to wait until we have a hierarchy of CLA's before we
> get general vision happening here.
>
> 3D rendering is a great idea!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>



-- 

Fergal Byrne, Brenter IT

<http://www.examsupport.ie>http://inbits.com - Better Living through
Thoughtful Technology

e:[email protected] t:+353 83 4214179
Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to