We're good so. Talk tomorrow. Night ;)
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Marek Otahal <[email protected]> wrote: > Fergal, > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Fergal Byrne <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> We're talking about NuPIC as a data processor here, not the neocortex. >> > > Finally we're clear, I was talking "neocortex-like simulator". > > >> If some of your data is a function of the time, then time is a valid >> input. Replacing actual data with empty records is a hack, not the other >> way round. And non-data is not valid for the neocortex either. At night we >> just sleep, and in fact we generate our own inputs just to keep the machine >> running. >> > > Yes, and the tick-toc still runs, but brain inhibits (same boring dark) > inputs from eyes, and other centers take over - so we have dreams. > > >> Pardon me if I come across as brusque; it's very late here, and I'm still >> recovering from jet lag... >> > > 3am here, I guess it's time. Good night :) > > > -- > Marek Otahal :o) > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > -- Fergal Byrne, Brenter IT <http://www.examsupport.ie>http://inbits.com - Better Living through Thoughtful Technology e:[email protected] t:+353 83 4214179 Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
