In that case, Doug King, would you be interested in leading a team in
a competition? I'll help you gather interested parties on the mailing
list and elsewhere.

---------
Matt Taylor
OS Community Flag-Bearer
Numenta


On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Pedro Tabacof <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm sorry for disappearing, but I work full time and it has been hell those
> past weeks (and I also moved to a new place). I don't know when I will be
> available for this kind of endeavor again.
>
> Pedro.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it matters whether it's a Kaggle competition or another ML
>> competition or public data set that is regularly used for this type of
>> thing.
>>
>> I started this wiki with ML competitions, and I'm interested in adding to
>> it. (Anyone else want to help out filling this list?)
>>
>> https://github.com/numenta/nupic/wiki/Machine-Learning-Competitions
>>
>> So there are some people in the community interested in working on a
>> competition with NuPIC, we just need a way to identify and organize them.
>> Since Pedro started this initiative, maybe he'd still be interested in
>> leading the charge?
>>
>> Pedro, what say you?
>>
>>
>> ---------
>> Matt Taylor
>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>> Numenta
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Doug King <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> I'm still interested in doing a Kaggle contest. I'm not sure why we did
>>> not get the momentum we needed - i assumed the Hackathon took some focus
>>> away, and it was ambitious to jump into a Kaggle contest half way to the
>>> deadline.
>>>
>>> I thought the contest we chose, weather prediction, was an good fit for
>>> the CLA - time based prediction, practical application, good metric for
>>> comparison to other approaches.
>>>
>>> Anyway, I'm interested in selecting another Kaggle contest. I think it's
>>> a great way to prove the value of the CLA approach and the dynamics of a
>>> contest using the Kaggle framework provide an excellent platform for this.
>>> If enough members want to do this its possible we could even assemble more
>>> than one team from our forum.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> -Doug
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Azat <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is convolutional network is NuPIC's category then.
>>>> How about preprocessing of images as linking the same digits via elastic
>>>> temporal transformations - it must be perfect in HTM's terms ?
>>>> I'm not sure it is allowed though..
>>>>
>>>> Azat
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------
>>>> On Wed, 11/13/13, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Subject: Re: [nupic-dev] Kaggle team assemble
>>>>  To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
>>>>  Date: Wednesday, November 13, 2013, 9:33 PM
>>>>
>>>>  That sounds good to me.
>>>>  Numenta has always been criticized[1] for not providing
>>>>  comparisons between NuPIC and other ML approaches by posting
>>>>  the results for standard data sets and taking part in
>>>>  competitions. It would be great if we could mobilize
>>>>  motivated members of the community to tackle things like
>>>>  this. I've created a wiki[2] with a list of common data
>>>>  sets used for ML comparisons, as well as competitions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  If anyone is willing to work with one of these
>>>>  data sets, I would be happy to publicize your work as well
>>>>  as I can. The more we can interact with the existing ML
>>>>  community, the more participation we'll get from them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  [1]
>>>> http://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1qdu8i/cla_quiz_office_hour/[2]
>>>>  https://github.com/numenta/nupic/wiki/Machine-Learning-Competitions
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ---------Matt
>>>>  TaylorOS Community
>>>>  Flag-BearerNumenta
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at
>>>>  7:11 PM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Matt,
>>>>  I didn't actually see any communication about
>>>>  it since the last email, so I'm not sure what happened.
>>>>  I ended up focusing my time on preparing the Pilot framework
>>>>  for the hackathon. Either way, there's not much time
>>>>  left in the competition now. Maybe we can shoot for another
>>>>  one?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  - Chetan
>>>>
>>>>  On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at
>>>>  7:14 AM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  So are you guys making any progress?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ---------Matt TaylorOS
>>>>  Community Flag-BearerNumenta
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Tue,
>>>>  Oct 22, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Kaggle team,
>>>>  Hope everyone's okay with communicating
>>>>  general stuff here, as per request.
>>>>  I was thinking that we could start simply, by
>>>>  just feeding in the stream of solar energy readings to the
>>>>  CLA sequentially. This will allow us to see how well it does
>>>>  at predicting solar energy from just the temporal sequence,
>>>>  and the time of day, day of week, etc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  In parallel, someone else can learn to extract
>>>>  what we need from the GEFS weather data, correlating the
>>>>  weather variables with each solar energy reading time. We
>>>>  can build a CSV file of all the variables together, and run
>>>>  a swarm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  How does this approach sound?
>>>>  I can volunteer to set up the project and start
>>>>  feeding the solar energy with temporal information to the
>>>>  CLA. Whoever wants to help is welcome to. Anyone up for
>>>>  massaging the GEFS data as described above?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Thanks,Chetan
>>>>  P.S. We still need a team
>>>>  name!
>>>>
>>>>  On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at
>>>>  9:31 PM, Tim McNamara <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  +1
>>>>  Very interested in observing this
>>>>  project
>>>>  On 22/10/2013 12:08 AM,
>>>>  "Matthew Taylor" <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Pedro et al,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Unless you're actually going to be dealing with
>>>>  proprietary
>>>>
>>>>  information, I encourage you to have your Kaggle discussions
>>>>  here on
>>>>
>>>>  the mailing list. I'm sure there are others out there
>>>>  interested in
>>>>
>>>>  what you're doing, but unable to take part (like me).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Feel free to start a new thread, or use this one, but please
>>>>  use this
>>>>
>>>>  list if you can. No one has complained about too many
>>>>  emails... yet
>>>>
>>>>  ;).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ---------
>>>>
>>>>  Matt Taylor
>>>>
>>>>  OS Community Flag-Bearer
>>>>
>>>>  Numenta
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Pedro Tabacof <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  > Hello,
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  > Thank you all for the interest. I think now it's
>>>>  time to create a private
>>>>
>>>>  > thread for the competition. The Solar Energy
>>>>  competition was the most voted
>>>>
>>>>  > one so it can be our first Kaggle attempt.
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  > If anyone else is also interested in joining the
>>>>  competition, just send me a
>>>>
>>>>  > message.
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  > Pedro.
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Doug King <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  >>
>>>>
>>>>  >> I'm interested in joining the team. I looked at
>>>>  the Kaggle contests and I
>>>>
>>>>  >> agree that the best choice would be Solar Energy
>>>>  Prediction, but I wouldn't
>>>>
>>>>  >> discount the Phone accelerometer contest. I think
>>>>  its a good fit for the CLA
>>>>
>>>>  >> and and interesting application. The forum posts
>>>>  for that contest seem to
>>>>
>>>>  >> indicate the sponsors are willing to judge a
>>>>  'clean' (no leakage) version of
>>>>
>>>>  >> the contest.
>>>>
>>>>  >>
>>>>
>>>>  >>
>>>>
>>>>  >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Jay Gokhale
>>>>  <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>> I'd love to use CLA's on a kaggle
>>>>  project!
>>>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>> If Chetan's description is correct, it
>>>>  seems to me that the Solar Energy
>>>>
>>>>  >>> Prediction contest would be the most straight
>>>>  forward one to work on.
>>>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>> Jay Gokhale
>>>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Matthew Taylor
>>>>  <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> These also sound like good hackathon
>>>>  projects!
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> Sent from my MegaPhone
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> On Oct 16, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Chetan Surpur
>>>>  <[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> I'm interested in participating!
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> I haven't decided on one yet, but I
>>>>  wanted to point out that the CLA
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> looks ideally suited for the AMS 2013-2014
>>>>  Solar Energy Prediction contest.
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> From what I can tell, it's about
>>>>  predicting the daily energy output of solar
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> farms from 12, 15, 18, 21, 24-hourly
>>>>  training data. There's 29 days to go.
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Pedro
>>>>  Tabacof <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> After the warm reception of the Kaggle
>>>>  competition idea, I decided to
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> create the thread asap. For those who
>>>>  are not aware, Kaggle is a data mining
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> competition website. It has been hyped
>>>>  on the machine learning media and has
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> some great people participating in it.
>>>>  It rewards with different prizes, but
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> my focus is not earn money, but rather
>>>>  to see how good NuPIC would fare
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> against the state of the art. I found
>>>>  those following competitions to be a
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> viable start:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> 1) Accelerometer Biometric Competition
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> From real acceleration data you have to
>>>>  guess from which cell phone
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> came the test samples.
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> 36 days to go
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Pros:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Multivariable, temporal data seems
>>>>  ideal for the CLA
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Cons:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -The best competitors are using data
>>>>  leaks (meta-information), so the
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> chance of winning fairly is zero
>>>>  (though they will give a consolation prize
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> to the best "honest" entry)
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Questions:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -How fast would NuPIC go through a 1GB
>>>>  CSV file?
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -The test data is not open-ended, that
>>>>  is, you have to say whether a
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> recording belongs to a specific cell
>>>>  phone or not, with 50% chance of being
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> right. Would NuPIC do well in this
>>>>  case?
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> 2) Multi-Label Bird Species
>>>>  Classification
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Try to guess the bird species present
>>>>  on some audio recordings
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> 38 days to go
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Pros:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Temporal data
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Cons:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Multiple labels, so I think we would
>>>>  need 87 different models, which
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> is kinda impractical
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Question:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Is there a better way to do
>>>>  multi-label classification with NuPIC?
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> 3) Conway's Reverse Game of Life
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Reverse the game of life for 1 to 5
>>>>  steps
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> 4 months to go
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Pros:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Natural input sparseness (have to
>>>>  check on it)
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Temporal data
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Multistep classification
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -We can generate our own training data
>>>>  if necessary
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Cons:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Maybe there are very straightforward
>>>>  ways to solve this (rule based,
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> brute force, etc)
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Too much time before the competition
>>>>  ends
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Questions:
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -How sparse does the input need to be
>>>>  for the CLA to work well?
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> -Is it possible to use a 2D arrangement
>>>>  on the cells connection matrix?
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> There is also the AMS 2013-2014 Solar
>>>>  Energy Prediction contest, but I
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> didn't have time to go over it. The
>>>>  other competitions don't seem to be
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> suited for NuPIC.
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Who here is interested on participating
>>>>  and what competition do you
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> think to be the most promising one?
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Pedro.
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Pedro Tabacof,
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> Unicamp - Eng. de Computação 08.
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  >>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>  >>>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  >>> nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  >>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  >>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>  >>>
>>>>
>>>>  >>
>>>>
>>>>  >>
>>>>
>>>>  >> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  >> nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  >> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>  >>
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  > --
>>>>
>>>>  > Pedro Tabacof,
>>>>
>>>>  > Unicamp - Eng. de Computação 08.
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>  > _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  > nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  > [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>  >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>  nupic mailing list
>>>>
>>>>  [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>  http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  nupic mailing list
>>>>  [email protected]
>>>>  http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nupic mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nupic mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nupic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pedro Tabacof,
> Unicamp - Eng. de Computação 08.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>

_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to