2013/12/26 Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>

> I have to say that I love the way you constructed the number cell data
> set in code:
> https://github.com/srgg6701/nupic/blob/gh-pages/www/cla/js/datasets.js
>
> I've never seen a data structure in code that actually resembles the
> way the data would like in a UI.
>

Thank you, Matt, probably it's just the art school legacy :)
But what about subject? Have you any ideas? Scott proposed to set 10
columns x 10 cells. What's your opinion?


> ---------
> Matt Taylor
> OS Community Flag-Bearer
> Numenta
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Sergey Cleftsow <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi, everybody!
> > I'm trying to use CLA in the simple example. Its prototype is available
> > on-line (http://srgg6701.github.io/nupic/www/cla/numbers.html), but
> there no
> > any code for recognition yet, because now I haven't a starting assumption
> > about which total number of columns and cells per single column would be
> > more appropriate for this example. There is a some receptive area (2-D
> > array) 16 х 20 elements. Inputs are "digits" stored in array within code.
> > They may come in some modes like fixed positions, random offset and/or
> > erosion. The speed of feeding and inputs limitation may be customized
> also.
> >
> > I read in some papers that there were lots of experiments about this
> > subject, but are there some mathematical (or another) basis to calculate
> > necessary values. It will be great to hear advice!
> >
> >
> > --
> > SY Sergey V. Cleftsow
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nupic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>



-- 
SY Sergey V. Cleftsow
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to