On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Christian Cleber Masdeval Braz <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>  Thank's for the answer.
>
>  Can you tell if in the new proposal the sequence learning algorithm is
> the same, i. e., is equal to the actual TP algorithm described in the
> paper. If this is the case, it will be enough just change the term
> "temporal pooler" to "sequence learner".
>

Internally we have started calling it the "sequence memory" or "sequence
learner" (I prefer the former, not sure others opinion) and we will likely
update the terminology in the code. I think we would be amenable to a PR
that made that change ;-)

>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-02-24 16:00 GMT-04:00 Scott Purdy <[email protected]>:
>
> Jeff posted an initial version of his new ideas to the list. The title was
>> something along the lines of New Temporal Pooling Proposal.
>>
>> It does not change the way sequence learning works. It changes temporal
>> pooling to happen between layers rather than as part of the sequence
>> memory. And it incorporated motor input (not output yet) in addition to
>> high order sequence memory for prediction.
>>  On Feb 24, 2014 11:43 AM, "Christian Cleber Masdeval Braz" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  Hi Ruaridh.
>>>
>>> Thank's for the feedback! Do you know if the new proposal will have a
>>> "sequence learner" and,  if so, the implementation will be different from
>>> the actual described in the paper? Or maybe the new TP will be the actual
>>> (sequence) + an improvement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>  Christian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-02-22 12:58 GMT-04:00 Ruaridh O'Donnell <[email protected]
>>> >:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I've just read through your document. It was a nice explanation of the
>>>> details of the CLA algorithm. The diagrams were very helpful at summing up
>>>> the points you made in the text.
>>>> I didn't spot any mistakes, everything looks correct. I'm quite
>>>> familiar with the CLA so I think I might be at least somewhat qualified to
>>>> proof read. One thing you might want to note is that the temporal pooler
>>>> you described (which is the same one as in the white paper) isn't quite how
>>>> the one in NuPIC works.
>>>> The NuPIC one is slightly simpler version that doesn't do as much. It
>>>> only does "sequence memory" as opposed to "temporal pooling". There are
>>>> plans to update the CLA to include temporal 
>>>> pooling<https://github.com/numenta/nupic/wiki/New-ideas-About-Temporal-Pooling>but
>>>>  that means that the temporal pooling aspects of the white paper
>>>> algorithm will likely become obsolete. Just noting this in case you were
>>>> wanting to continue working on the explanation. It might be better to
>>>> explain the current NuPIC version rather than the white paper version.
>>>>
>>>> Ruaridh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:15 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is great!! Thank you!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Feb 20, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Christian Cleber Masdeval Braz <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >  Hi all.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >   I made an attempt of writing a summary of the CLA theory and
>>>>> algorithm. To do that I used the articles, videos, this discussion list 
>>>>> and
>>>>> other external materials. As the content is based on my understandings, i
>>>>> would appreciate a lot if the comunity could validade it with corrections
>>>>> and sugestions.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >  The PDF follows attached.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Christian
>>>>> >
>>>>> > <IntroductiontoCLAAlgorithm.pdf>
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > nupic mailing list
>>>>> > [email protected]
>>>>> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> nupic mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> nupic mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nupic mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nupic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to