Well, i will keep you updated regarding any response from OpenCV. I believe that they use TBB but unsure what role that plays in thread safety as opposed to creating threads.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]> wrote: > I would think so, especially since it would allow more people to > contribute. > > On April 27, 2014 at 8:58:22 PM, Daniel Bell ( > [email protected]) wrote: > > Would OpenCL be a better direction than pure GPU? > > I've asked on the OpenCV forum how they have approached this. There are a > number of options. > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I would love to discuss how we would go about making NuPIC parallel. We >> could really use the boost in bandwidth, especially as we approach the >> future. If we could easily refactor the C++ implementation to use the >> graphics card, that could enable applying the CLA to problems that require >> low latency computation. >> On Apr 27, 2014 8:35 PM, "Daniel Bell" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> HI Chetan, >>> >>> I can certainly do that in the next couple of months. If we could find >>> an answer to this, then i can make some progress towards this in a >>> massively parallel and async way. ;) >>> >>> As far as i am aware, OpenCV is completely thread safe. Maybe we could >>> take some inspiration from there. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Daniel, >>>> >>>> Great question! I'm not entirely sure, but I just wanted to say that >>>> it would be great if someone experimented with parallelizing NuPIC :) >>>> >>>> - Chetan >>>> >>>> On April 27, 2014 at 8:17:41 PM, Daniel Bell ( >>>> [email protected]) wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am interested in the progress of this project. From the activity on >>>> the mailing lists, i can see that the next few months will be very >>>> interesting as more material becomes available. I am yet to download and >>>> install due to time restrictions on my current workload. >>>> >>>> My intention is to use this project within my application once it is in >>>> a more stable state. When designing my application i am attempting to use >>>> a large amount multi-threading and so i want to know what considerations i >>>> will need to think about. >>>> >>>> How thread safe are the C++ bindings? What aspects would require >>>> locking for async tasks. >>>> >>>> My application will lean toward detection and classification problems >>>> for 2D matrices. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> nupic mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> nupic mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nupic mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > > > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > >
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
