Also where I can find modern research articles about role or function of
metadotropic receptors? Links or books will be nice to have:)

With best regards,

Maxim Krymchak


On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Максим Крымчак <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Can we ask Jeff to post his detailed new ideas about layers in context of
> sensory-motor integration? In his video he skip the topic about this, but I
> think it's very important for all of us.
> Please tell us where we can find this information if there is any or whet
> it will be published. Also there is a promise in CLA white paper about
> updates to it according to progress in implementation. When it will be
> updated to reflect current status of theory basis and actual implementation?
>
> With best regards,
>
> Maxim Krymchak
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Send nupic mailing list submissions to
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe, visit
>>         http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of nupic digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: nupic Digest, Vol 12, Issue 78 (Matthew Taylor)
>>    2. Re: PROPOSAL: Drop Python 2.6 support for NuPIC (Matthew Taylor)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 21:27:11 -0700
>> From: Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>
>> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [nupic-discuss] nupic Digest, Vol 12, Issue 78
>> Message-ID:
>>         <CAJv6nDNoCgWmFpYYe9rHbF=DvRaGoOZGtmqWT9H7MT=
>> [email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> Magnus, thanks for the message. But I think it would fit better in the
>> nupic-theory mailing list.
>>
>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic-theory_lists.numenta.org
>>
>> Regards,
>> ---------
>> Matt Taylor
>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>> Numenta
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Magnus McWootton <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > I just had a thought, and its do with the hierarchy, and inference, and
>> > spacial pooling.
>> >
>> > when you are inferring, you wind up, every symantic, a percentage error,
>> > coming up the proximals,
>> > you can use a threshold to instantly activate it at some error.    but
>> > wouldnt it be better, if you just passed up the error?
>> > it works better this way, because then your smaller groups will work
>> better,
>> > because they dont get stuck at an error minima.
>> > the later symantics can then "continuify" the error to a more exact
>> > quotient, by reading the error of the previous level, using
>> > the errors together to make a new error, which would have less error
>> than
>> > the previous level, most of the time.
>> >
>> > then you could keep passing the error till the last region, then have an
>> > exact "nearness" to the novel input
>> > using every single symantic together, leaving activation till later,
>> making
>> > use of the distribution together.
>> >
>> > notes about my system->
>> > Its purely spacial, with no temporal yet, that makes this idea much
>> easier
>> > to do.  i also finish at a single
>> > collection, so all i have to do to inference is pick the cell of least
>> > error.  and it also has a separate inferencing stage from training
>> > so i dont know if this idea applies to htm,   but possibly could be
>> useful
>> > to know.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > nupic mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 07:32:04 -0700
>> From: Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>
>> To: "NuPIC general mailing list." <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [nupic-discuss] PROPOSAL: Drop Python 2.6 support for
>>         NuPIC
>> Message-ID:
>>         <
>> cajv6ndnbfo8yps4z92r1uc95esirxoz9qty1qo+364cem-u...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> We've got to get builds running once again, and Austin has a PR [1]
>> that does this, but removes Python 2.6 support. We usually give
>> proposals like this 72 hours, but I'm going to push the merge button
>> so we can get our pipeline unclogged. Pull requests are backing up.
>>
>> If anyone reading this really needs Python 2.6 support, let's continue
>> the discussion about adding it back in. But in the meantime, we've
>> moving forward with this proposal.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/numenta/nupic/pull/906
>>
>> Regards,
>> ---------
>> Matt Taylor
>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>> Numenta
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Archie, Kevin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Mac OS X has shipped with 2.7 since Lion (2 major versions ago, July
>> 2011)
>> > and it's reasonably straightforward to put 2.7 on earlier releases.
>> >
>> >   - Kevin
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On May 1, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Subutai Ahmad wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I believe most unix OS's still ship with Python 2.6.x out of the box -
>> is
>> > that right?   If so, people will need to install 2.7 before using
>> NuPIC. As
>> > long as that is OK, I'm +1 for this.
>> >
>> > --Subutai
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:32 PM, habib valanejad <
>> [email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> The latest version of Python on Solaris is 2.6.8 .
>> >> Regarding Solaris port, I'm looking forward to discuss this matter with
>> >> you guys on Saturday.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Habib
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 05/01/2014 11:44 AM, Marek Otahal wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 ,although I'd like to hear about other "platforms" first - Solaris
>> >> recently, ...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Ian Danforth <[email protected]
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Austin Marshall <[email protected]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1 for deprecating 2.6.  Though, I'd be perfectly happy if someone
>> took
>> >>>> on the role of supporting 2.6 as-needed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> This means we would drop our Python 2.6 builds from the Travis-CI
>> >>>>> matrix and remove python 2.6 packages from our support repos [1][2].
>> >>>>> NuPIC would only support Python 2.7.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> If you are using NuPIC with Python 2.6 and are unable or unwilling
>> to
>> >>>>> upgrade to Python 2.7, this is your chance to speak up.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Pros: This would significantly decrease NuPIC build loads within our
>> >>>>> continuous integration environment, de-complicate our builds, and
>> make
>> >>>>> it easier for us to support installation.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Cons: NuPIC would only support Python 2.7.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> This discussion came up while we were figuring out how to handle
>> >>>>> recent Travis-CI failures [3].
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [1] https://github.com/numenta/nupic-linux64
>> >>>>> [2] https://github.com/numenta/nupic-darwin64
>> >>>>> [3] https://github.com/numenta/nupic/issues/901
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ---------
>> >>>>> Matt Taylor
>> >>>>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>> >>>>> Numenta
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> nupic mailing list
>> >>>>> [email protected]
>> >>>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> nupic mailing list
>> >>>> [email protected]
>> >>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> nupic mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Marek Otahal :o)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> nupic mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> nupic mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > nupic mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> >
>> > The material in this message is private and may contain Protected
>> Healthcare
>> > Information (PHI). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised
>> that
>> > any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in
>> > reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If
>> you
>> > have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender
>> via
>> > telephone or return mail.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > nupic mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nupic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of nupic Digest, Vol 13, Issue 3
>> ************************************
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to