Wow ... a kaggle competition is wonderful. It will provide even better
annotated data for the project. Please count me in if someone else is also
interested.
On May 20, 2014 9:08 PM, "Matthew Taylor" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Keep in mind that we have a SoN project [1] dealing with seizure
> detection. You guys should talk to Anubhav if someone plans on working
> on it.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/numenta/nupic/wiki/SoN-2014-Projects#epilepsy-seizure-prediction
> ---------
> Matt Taylor
> OS Community Flag-Bearer
> Numenta
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > This Kaggle competition looks great! I suggest the following as a
> starting
> > approach for competing in it:
> >
> > Train two models, one for Ictal (seizure) and one for Interictal
> (normal).
> > With learning on, feed training data to the respective model. Then, with
> > learning turned off, feed a test sample to both models, and record the
> > anomaly scores for each model on the test sample. Classify the sample
> based
> > on the lower anomaly score between the two.
> >
> > I'm willing to help out with this, if anyone is interested in
> participating.
> >
> >
> > On May 19, 2014 at 4:24:05 PM, Doug King ([email protected]) wrote:
> >
> > I think the criticism is valid if we don't have repeatable proof of
> results
> > that can be evaluated against other machine learning methods. We don't
> seem
> > to have a good framework for that. Unfortunately all the benchmarks out
> > there all are based around static object recognition. Does anyone know of
> > any time based / temporal datasets being used as benchmarks?
> >
> > I haven't checked in with Kaggle for a while. To my surprise, today they
> > opened a competition that is a good fit for NuPic and something we have
> > discussed here before as a worthwhile and interesting demo. It is the
> UPenn
> > and Mayo Clinic's Seizure Detection Challenge. It looks like it is open
> to
> > anyone, not just high rankers, and the purse is $8000 USD. Competition
> > closes Aug. 19 and so far about 8 teams have signed up.
> > https://www.kaggle.com/c/seizure-detection
> >
> > -Doug
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Pedro Tabacof <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> While DeepMind's results are impressive, as far as I know their deep
> >> neural network was static, and the games they did really well were
> somewhat
> >> "static" games, with little long-term dependence between the game
> states.
> >> "Dynamic" games, such as Pitfall, perform rather poorly, so this could
> be an
> >> interesting problem to apply reinforcement learning (or motor control)
> with
> >> Nupic.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Craig Quiter <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think it would be interesting to see how NuPIC scores in the Arcade
> >>> Learning Environment. http://www.arcadelearningenvironment.org/DeepMind 
> >>> did
> >>> very well here with a combination of convolutional neural nets for
> spatial
> >>> pooling and Q-learning with some clever tricks to do temporal pooling
> and
> >>> driving of actions. http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~vmnih/docs/dqn.pdfThey have
> >>> a neuron per action at the top of their net, much like classification
> in
> >>> NuPIC works.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I agree that we need to show the CLA's performance on standard
> >>>> benchmarks. However, I don't think those benchmarks are MNIST or
> ImageNet
> >>>> (as Yann LeCun suggests), at least not at this point in time.
> Instead, we
> >>>> need to find good time-dependent datasets that exercise the targeted
> >>>> capabilities of the CLA.
> >>>>
> >>>> On May 19, 2014 at 4:38:03 AM, Nicholas Mitri ([email protected])
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I would classify those as more honest (albeit blunt) than rude.
> >>>> Realistically, HTM/CLA hasn’t earned its stripes yet but that’s what
> >>>> we’re trying to do as a community.
> >>>>
> >>>> Unfortunately, there’s a lot of ‘going with the flow’ in the efforts
> >>>> I’ve been aware of. A more critical approach is necessary on our part
> as a
> >>>> community. There are very well known benchmarks any algorithm like
> CLA needs
> >>>> to perform well on and, at this point, it should be an utmost
> priority for
> >>>> us to put CLA through its paces and start to validate its claims
> rather than
> >>>> accept them at face value.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think it would be great if a part of the community took it upon
> itself
> >>>> to do just that (I’d be the first to volunteer!). Focus on breaking
> down CLA
> >>>> into its individual components and validating the theories on those
> levels.
> >>>> Not only does that grant it merit should its claims hold true but
> it’ll also
> >>>> reveal a lot of ways in which it can be improved or optimized.
> >>>>
> >>>> best,
> >>>> Nick
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On May 19, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Fergal Byrne <
> [email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yann LeCun (Director of AI Research at Facebook) gave a fascinating
> AMA
> >>>> on Reddit [1] a few days ago.
> >>>>
> >>>> As usual, a few people asked him about Jeff, HTM, Numenta and NuPIC.
> As
> >>>> usual, his answers varied from the somewhat complimentary [2] to the
> >>>> downright rude [3].
> >>>>
> >>>> The whole AMA is well worth reading, but I was wondering what people
> >>>> here think about the scorn many leading lights in Machine Learning
> and AI
> >>>> heap on HTM/CLA.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/25lnbt/ama_yann_lecun/
> >>>> [2]
> >>>>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/25lnbt/ama_yann_lecun/chisjsc
> >>>> [3]
> >>>>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/25lnbt/ama_yann_lecun/chj9pwm
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> Fergal Byrne, Brenter IT
> >>>>
> >>>> Author, Real Machine Intelligence with Clortex and NuPIC
> >>>> https://leanpub.com/realsmartmachines
> >>>>
> >>>> Speaking on Clortex and HTM/CLA at euroClojure Krakow, June 2014:
> >>>> http://euroclojure.com/2014/
> >>>> and at LambdaJam Chicago, July 2014: http://www.lambdajam.com
> >>>>
> >>>> http://inbits.com - Better Living through Thoughtful Technology
> >>>> http://ie.linkedin.com/in/fergbyrne/ - https://github.com/fergalbyrne
> >>>>
> >>>> e:[email protected] t:+353 83 4214179
> >>>> Join the quest for Machine Intelligence at http://numenta.org
> >>>> Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> nupic mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> nupic mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> nupic mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> nupic mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Pedro Tabacof
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nupic mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nupic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nupic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> nupic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
>
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to