Hi David,

2. Will the new TM implementation be encapsulated in more "biological-like" 
structures? I noticed a difference between the work Marek has done and the 
current CLA implementation in terms of the discrete biological modeling?

I'm not sure I fully understand your question. It will be closer to the white 
paper, without the non-biological additions that currently exist in the TP 
implementation. Also, it will be a little easier to map to the biology than the 
white paper description (and will incorporate a couple minor changes to make it 
more biologically feasible). But at the end of the day, the white paper 
description draws almost directly from our understanding of the biology.

- Chetan

On July 14, 2014 at 9:58:28 PM, cogmission1 . ([email protected]) 
wrote:

Hi Matthew (Lohbihler), Yuwei, Chetan,

I apologize for my lack of a prompt response.  Thank you all for your responses!

@Matthew - I initially wrote about my interest in porting the existing 
implementation to Java in another thread in which Matthew (Taylor) suggested I 
have a look at Marek Otahal's project on github (listed below).

>> If you're interested in porting to Java, you might have a look at Marek 
>> Otahal's "htm-cla" project on Github [1]. Marek is one of our main community 
>> contributors, and before we open-sourced NuPIC, he wrote up his 
>> implementation of the CLA White Paper algorithms in Java (that's how I found 
>> him!).

>> [1] https://github.com/breznak/htm-cla

If you're interested in the Java port, you might have a look at this too. I'm 
still building my understanding of the SP/TM/(and future TP) mechanisms, and 
would like to wait for the new TM mechanism that Chetan is developing and as 
well as the new TP implementation. I think I would like to understand the 
various mechanisms very thoroughly  before "diving in" to code - but I'm still 
available for discussion in the meantime; we should keep in touch and thank you 
for your offer!

In addition,  I'm still reviewing the implementation of Marek's which will also 
help build an understanding. I will probably develop an additional 
implementation, though  not as a comment or critique on Marek's efforts, but 
just so that I can "shore" up my own understanding and go beyond the core 
mechanisms into the encoders, classifiers, and other peripheral support modules 
with the Java port.

@Yuwei, Chetan - thank you for your clarifications and sharing the progress on 
your current projects. I wanted to ask another question. 

1. Outside of the CLA algorithm implementation there are the swarming 
mechanism, the encoders and classifiers. Are these considered to be the 
difference between the "core" algorithm and the Online Prediction Framework 
(OPF)?  

2. Will the new TM implementation be encapsulated in more "biological-like" 
structures? I noticed a difference between the work Marek has done and the 
current CLA implementation in terms of the discrete biological modeling?

Cheers,
David


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]> wrote:
David,

I'd also like to mention that I'm beginning work on a simplified temporal 
memory (what you called sequence memory) implementation, that's closer to the 
white paper description. This work should be completed in the near future. 
However, you can still definitely port the existing temporal memory (currently 
called TP) implementation to Java if you don't want to wait for the simplified 
one.

- Chetan


On July 14, 2014 at 9:02:58 AM, Yuwei Cui ([email protected]) wrote:

Hi David,

Each layer will be implementing sequence memory (we now call it temporal 
memory). The goal is to predict future input based on past inputs. Spatial 
pooling and sequence memory will not be combined. If you have read the white 
paper, the spatial pooling occurs on the proximal dendrite, which can drive 
cells into "active states", and sequence memory relies on inputs on distal 
dendrite, which will turn cells into "predicted states"

Our current working hypothesis is temporal pooling occurs both between layer 4 
and layer 3, and across regions. The outcome of temporal pooling is more stable 
representation higher in the hierarchy. There will be an emphasis on the 
stability soon, we already have a working temporal pooling algorithm and will 
release it in the near future. The inter-regional feedback seems a little 
further down the road.

Yuwei


On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 3:12 PM, cogmission1 . <[email protected]> 
wrote:
Hey Matt,

I just watched the "Fireside chat" about Jeff's next TP ideas, and not to be 
argumentative (just looking to be as clear as I can be while watching things 
happen from the outside), but it appears as if he's going to introduce sequence 
memory, and temporal pooling between each layer? I think definitely between 
within layers 3 and 4? Also, it appears as if the SP and the Sequence Memory 
will be combined? Additionally, it looks like there will be some 
"inter-regional" feedback/predictions introduced between a subsequent region's 
layer 6 back into layer 5 of the previous layer. It maybe looks like some 
drastic overall changes may be occurring - maybe due to an effort toward 
emphasizing concepts of stability and inter-regional feedback?. Any news as to 
when we could see these changes rolled out - I can hardly wait...?  :-P




On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
You can definitely dive in now. The new temporal memory work isn't going to 
disrupt the current architecture at all, as far as I know. 

Start here: https://github.com/numenta/nupic/wiki/Learning-NuPIC

---------
Matt Taylor
OS Community Flag-Bearer
Numenta


On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:42 AM, cogmission1 . <[email protected]> 
wrote:
Hi Everyone,

I'm at the point now where I would begin to delve into the NuPIC code more 
deeply (I want to port it to Java as a way to exercise my understanding too), 
but I was wondering if there is any point to it prior to the new TP/Sequence 
Memory implementation? Should I maybe wait?

Thanks 

David

_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org



_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org



_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org




--
--
Yuwei Cui

Algorithm Internship, Numenta Inc.

PhD Candidate, Neuroscience and Cognitive Science

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742

Homepage: http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~ywcui/

_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org


_______________________________________________  
nupic mailing list  
[email protected]  
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org  
_______________________________________________
nupic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org

Reply via email to