You're right. I saw something in a brief perusal and took it for some thing it wasn't. I totally retract that comment. Thanks Chetan and Fergal.
David Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 8, 2014, at 5:58 PM, Chetan Surpur <[email protected]> wrote: > > David, > > None of the temporal memory implementations have ever had time as an explicit > signal, as far as I remember. > > - Chetan > >> On Aug 8, 2014 10:21 AM, "cogmission1 ." <[email protected]> wrote: >> >3. Naming issues related to "new Temporal Pooling", use of TP in past >> >discussions, code, and mailing list discussions. This has not been >> >addressed, and perhaps an online discussion would be better than an >> >email-based one (which clearly hasn't done the job). Perhaps Office Hours >> >is not the right forum for this; in which case we could still plan a >> >Hangouts-based session to debate, discuss and agree on the way forward. >> >> Re: >> >> I noticed that the actual time stamp is taken out of the new TemporalMemory, >> relegating the new design to one that observes sequence only - regardless of >> timing between inputs... Was wondering what the thinking behind this was? >> >> David >> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Fergal Byrne <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> Hi Matt, >>> >>> Possible ideas: >>> >>> 1. Geospatial encoders. I think a Q&A with Chetan and Jeff would be really >>> interesting and informative. >>> >>> 2. Jeff's new Temporal Pooling theory. A lot of people are still confused >>> about lots of this, and I feel the talks so far have been mostly exposition >>> by Jeff rather than interactive. >>> >>> 3. Naming issues related to "new Temporal Pooling", use of TP in past >>> discussions, code, and mailing list discussions. This has not been >>> addressed, and perhaps an online discussion would be better than an >>> email-based one (which clearly hasn't done the job). Perhaps Office Hours >>> is not the right forum for this; in which case we could still plan a >>> Hangouts-based session to debate, discuss and agree on the way forward. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Fergal Byrne >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> We're having an office hour on Monday: >>>> >>>> https://plus.google.com/b/100642636108337517466/events/c8ogadmp4n91rd8r0ve3ah9v41s >>>> >>>> Does anyone have any ideas about topics we should focus on? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> --------- >>>> Matt Taylor >>>> OS Community Flag-Bearer >>>> Numenta >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> nupic mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Fergal Byrne, Brenter IT >>> >>> Author, Real Machine Intelligence with Clortex and NuPIC >>> https://leanpub.com/realsmartmachines >>> >>> Speaking on Clortex and HTM/CLA at euroClojure Krakow, June 2014: >>> http://euroclojure.com/2014/ >>> and at LambdaJam Chicago, July 2014: http://www.lambdajam.com >>> >>> http://inbits.com - Better Living through Thoughtful Technology >>> http://ie.linkedin.com/in/fergbyrne/ - https://github.com/fergalbyrne >>> >>> e:[email protected] t:+353 83 4214179 >>> Join the quest for Machine Intelligence at http://numenta.org >>> Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nupic mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nupic mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org > _______________________________________________ > nupic mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
_______________________________________________ nupic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.numenta.org/mailman/listinfo/nupic_lists.numenta.org
