So far, I've missed 3 messages, and Felix also reported that he missed
some as well. The problem is not fixed yet. I'm still working with
EMWD (our service provider) to fix it.

I really appreciate all your replies, thanks.
---------
Matt Taylor
OS Community Flag-Bearer
Numenta


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Sylvain Benner
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think I received all the test messages from all the MLs and their
> associated replies. Good luck Matt! :-)
>
> Note: I'm a new subscriber and last week I had several replies in the spam
> box (gmail). After marking them as not spam, it seems to be OK now.
>
> -syl20bnr-
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Matthew Taylor via nupic
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks everyone, but I need more replies. Even if you're already
>> replied, reply again if you can (even multiple times! just use
>> different body content). Be sure to "reply all" so it doesn't just get
>> sent to the message originator (this is a change I made today to try
>> to address the problem).
>>
>> This is to test that the settings I change have an effect. I'm
>> comparing the messages I'm receiving in my mail client to those I see
>> popping up on
>> http://lists.numenta.org/pipermail/nupic_lists.numenta.org/2014-August/thread.html#end.
>> If there are any messages on the web archive that you are not
>> receiving, the problem has not been fixed!
>> ---------
>> Matt Taylor
>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>> Numenta
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Matthew Lohbihler
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Here!
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from Samsung Mobile
>> >
>> >
>> > -------- Original message --------
>> > From: Matthew Taylor via nupic
>> > Date:08-25-2014 7:40 PM (GMT-05:00)
>> > To: NuPIC Discuss
>> > Subject: nupic-discuss mailing list test #2
>> >
>> > I'm sorry to keep doing this to you all, but I want to get this fixed!
>> > Please respond again (even if you already have on other threads).
>> >
>> > ---------
>> > Matt Taylor
>> > OS Community Flag-Bearer
>> > Numenta
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>


Reply via email to