I think this would be a very interesting problem to work on. But it seems to me to implement what the article is talking about would require changes to the internet protocol, which of course would be a long and tortuous process. And without knowing what changes to IP will be approved, we can't know what data NuPIC would have available for analysis.

It's a chicken and egg problem. You have to iterate through a process of IP and routing software changes in order to test improvement proposals. And at the end of your iterations, you have both the necessary IP changes as well as the routing software. NuPIC could be used within the iterations i suppose, but there's still a lot of old-fashioned hard work to do.


On 9/8/2014 1:24 PM, Matthew Taylor wrote:
Rik has a great point here (and a nice article). If someone can figure out how to use NuPIC to solve this problem, we'd be the darlings of the internet (for a short period of time).

Is anyone else thinking along these lines?

---------
Matt Taylor
OS Community Flag-Bearer
Numenta

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Rik <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Everyone

    If you're not thinking hard about how to put machine intelligence
    to work in computer networking, then you're doing the wrong thing.
    Leave your robots and other anthropocentric toy projects aside and
    work on stuff that matters!

    Some good pep talk:
    
http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/networks/why-the-internet-needs-cognitive-protocols

    A good example how the 'motor' in 'sensory-motor integration' can
    and should be taken to be more metaphorical rather than an actual
    motor. The 'action' an intelligent agent on the network takes is
    to send some data down a pipe. This may eventually result in a
    motor action at the other end of the pipe but that's taken care
    of, plenty of people are busy hooking up motors to the 'net
    already. Who does the cognitive bit?

    Cheers

    Rik




Reply via email to