Hello everyone,

I am happy to share my work, I have to put it back online and I will post
to the kaggle forum today. I was hoping to use nupic to preprocess raw eeg
data to extract an anomaly signal and then apply classical approaches down
stream. The computational complexity makes it impractical so I will have to
preprocess the raw data in some meaningful way before feeding it to the
HTM. Not quite sure what this would look like and I am happily taking
suggestions.

Nicolas.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Fergal Byrne <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Thanks for posting that Matt, it was really informative, and thanks to Dr
> Pantera for his kindness and patience with us!
>
> I've set up a NuPIC team for the second Kaggle competition, and invited
> some of the people from the weekend. Anubhav has joined and is transferring
> over his scripts today.
>
> If you'd like to join, please email me at this address with your Kaggle
> email and github handle (I have a private repo set up again). If Nicolas is
> agreeable, we could start submitting based on his work in the next day or
> two..
>
> Regards,
>
> Fergal Byrne
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Anubhav Chaturvedi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Its great to see that NuPIC community is now involved actively in
>> pursuing seizure detection and there is sufficient interest. Thank you Matt
>> for organizing this talk in the Hackathon and hope you all found it
>> intriguing too.
>>
>> I have been studying more on the subject and have also made submission
>> trying out different techniques. So far I have reached a score of 0.7 but
>> traditional approaches don't seem to be helping me anymore. Let me know if
>> someone would like to discus more on this.
>>
>> I loved the talk and here are a few things that I found particularly
>> interesting.
>>
>> It is known that artifacts like muscle or eye movement have been known to
>> mess up the EEG recording and has been a problem with BCI as well. The fact
>> that 80% of EEG recordings of epilepsy patients is normal was new. I did
>> not know that and it is interesting to think how we can overcome this
>> constraint.
>>
>> Another thing was the mention of Deep Brain Simulators(DBS). These are
>> electrodes that are implanted to overcome seizure by providing electrical
>> impulses. Now when I read about them earlier, there was a skepticism
>> surrounding their efficiency. Sure they have been shown to be helpful but
>> to what extent, it cannot be determined. This has mainly been because of
>> poor seizure detectors. The problem is if you provide the impulse and you
>> claim that the seizure has stopped because of it, you need to be 100% sure
>> in the first step itself that a seizure was about to occur. And since the
>> seizure did not occur, you cannot be sure if it was a false positive or if
>> it was because of DBS.
>>
>> One more thing that I have noticed is that neurologists mainly observer
>> scalp EEG signals unlike the intracranial signals provided in the
>> competition. Physicians and surgeon, I have observed, have developed an
>> intuitive understanding of when seizure has occurred or maybe is about to
>> occur. This is what they have learned from their years of experience and
>> the surrounding data like ECG, physical condition, etc. are also helpful.
>> Because of this they find it very difficult to explain if you ask them just
>> on the basis of EEG hoe to detect seizures.
>> Also  intracranial is only recorded when the patient is undergoing
>> surgery and they already have spit open his brain. This has been a bottle
>> neck because there is only a small duration of recording you can make in
>> the first place and even fewer duration of seizure clips occur. This is
>> evident in the competition data.
>>
>> *Regards,*
>> *Anubhav Chaturvedi*
>>
>> *Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani*
>> KK Birla Goa Campus
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hideaki,
>>>
>>> You'll probably really enjoy one of the hack demos I'll be publishing
>>> soon. I won't spoil the surprise, but it involves EEG mind control. ;)
>>> ---------
>>> Matt Taylor
>>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>>> Numenta
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Hideaki Suzuki <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Matt,
>>> >
>>> > Thank you for sharing the interesting video!!
>>> >
>>> > I also watched the hackathon raw, and I was very impressed that many
>>> people
>>> > were now interested in reading EEG by HTM. (in addition to those fun
>>> staff
>>> > like MindCraft ;-)
>>> >
>>> > I recently read the below article and would like to share.  This is
>>> also a
>>> > good short article about EEG(actually ECG) and remote-controlling a
>>> robot
>>> > limb (IEEE spectrum), using the data collected from seizure patients.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://online.qmags.com/IEEESM12819043?sessionID=BC9E010ABEF488AB56FC61EE2&cid=1010491&eid=19043#pg39&mode2
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Hideaki Suzuki.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Fergal Byrne, Brenter IT
>
> http://inbits.com - Better Living through Thoughtful Technology
> http://ie.linkedin.com/in/fergbyrne/ - https://github.com/fergalbyrne
>
> Founder of Clortex: HTM in Clojure -
> https://github.com/nupic-community/clortex
>
> Author, Real Machine Intelligence with Clortex and NuPIC
> Read for free or buy the book at https://leanpub.com/realsmartmachines
>
> Speaking on Clortex and HTM/CLA at euroClojure Krakow, June 2014:
> http://euroclojure.com/2014/
> and at LambdaJam Chicago, July 2014: http://www.lambdajam.com
>
> e:[email protected] t:+353 83 4214179
> Join the quest for Machine Intelligence at http://numenta.org
> Formerly of Adnet [email protected] http://www.adnet.ie
>

Reply via email to