Jeff , You are right , it seems like the acceptance to this future as a possibility is forming quickly. I guess most people wont be able to re-invent themselves , when the computer revolution happened, most people did not go back to school and retrain them selves. Like with most fundamental transitions there are some goods and some bads to this. What excites me is that this is happening and happening fast.
Chandan On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jeff Fohl <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you Chandan. A very interesting piece. It appears that our future is > destined to be one in which, in order to survive, the human worker will > face increasing pressure to provide something that cannot easily by > automated. Will this force us all to be more creative, or be destined to > compete (and lose) against robots? Or, perhaps we will move towards a > society in which there is a greater social safety net, to allow its members > the space in order to continually re-invent themselves and provide value? > > Personally, I don't know. > > - Jeff > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:58 PM Pascal Weinberger < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The decreasing workforce really can be a destruction for many.... Not >> only in these hands-on jobs, but also in office jobs etc. -every repetitive >> task [1]. This seems hard to some, but provokes end 'enforces' more >> creative and vibrant, project-based work as this is still more 'efficient >> and cheaper' with human employees... >> >> [1]: >> http://www.blueprism.com/?gclid=CjwKEAjw0-epBRDOp7f7lOG0zl4SJABxJg9qSVYfOqxJhMBh3SAkqxU3DzPj9hucRBXv9dkyTAdOQRoCGfTw_wcB >> >> 2015-04-24 23:22 GMT+02:00 Chandan Maruthi <[email protected]>: >> >>> I found this video on the front page of NyTimes on Robotics\AI\Etc . >>> NyTimes will make a series of videos in this area. >>> >>> http://nyti.ms/1GfzqoA >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> Chandan Maruthi >>> >>> >> -- Regards Chandan Maruthi
