So we need to change everything build atop of nupic to that as well?
On Aug 19, 2015 2:15 AM, "Matthew Taylor" <[email protected]> wrote:

> NuPIC and associated projects are now AGPL as of 0.2.7.
>
> http://numenta.org/blog/2015/08/17/licensing-update.html
>
> Thanks for your support.
>
> ---------
> Matt Taylor
> OS Community Flag-Bearer
> Numenta
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello NuPIC,
>>
>> I wanted to let you all know that we have decided to move from GPLv3
>> to AGPLv3. We are planning on making this change for all our OS
>> repositories that are currently GPLv3 within the next 2 weeks.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> ---------
>> Matt Taylor
>> OS Community Flag-Bearer
>> Numenta
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hello NuPIC,
>> >
>> > Following is a note from Numenta CEO Donna Dubinsky about a license
>> > change we've been considering for awhile now. Please read:
>> >
>> > * * *
>> >
>> > To members of the NuPIC community…
>> >
>> > I’m writing you today on a likely change in direction on NuPIC
>> > licensing going forward.  I’ve discussed this direction with several
>> > members of the NuPIC community, and would value your input as well.
>> > You can reach me at [email protected] with any thoughts on this
>> > subject or on licensing in general.
>> >
>> > When we made the decision to use the GPLv3 license several years ago,
>> > the GPL seemed like a good fit for our needs as we were trying to
>> > promote a community that shares their work, rather than going with a
>> > more permissive style license that allows individuals to keep it
>> > private.  As you know, we elected to have a dual license strategy to
>> > separately work with those individuals who wanted to build proprietary
>> > commercial applications.
>> >
>> > Now, several years later, we are seeing some concern on the question
>> > of how the GPLv3 applies to SaaS implementations (SaaS is “software as
>> > a service”, or cloud-based implementations).  We have heard from SaaS
>> > developers who feel comfortable using the GPL but not distributing the
>> > source.  As this was not the spirit of our original licensing
>> > selection, we are now leaning towards transitioning to the AGPLv3
>> > (Affero General Public License) going forward.  The AGPL makes clear
>> > that use in a SaaS implementation is also considered a distribution
>> > and thus must fully comply with the GPL.  In the last few years, we’ve
>> > seen increasing adoption of the AGPL, used for products such as Mongo
>> > DB.  Note that the AGPLv3 is explicitly designed to be the same as the
>> > GPLv3 with the additional of the SaaS clarification.
>> >
>> > Based on initial feedback, we are planning to move forward with this
>> > change in the coming weeks.  I believe that this will impact the NuPIC
>> > community in a positive way by plugging the loophole that does not
>> > clearly require distribution in SaaS instances.  From a commercial
>> > perspective, this change gives a clearer delineation that a commercial
>> > license would be required for a proprietary SaaS implementation.
>> >
>> > Links to both licenses are below.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your interest and your investment of time in NuPIC.
>> >
>> > Donna
>> >
>> > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html
>> > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html
>> >
>> > * * *
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks for reading. I hope this doesn't alarm anyone. We've been
>> > discussing this change for awhile now, and I think it is the right
>> > thing to do. It Please let us know if you have any feedback, but the
>> > bottom line is that this change should not affect you at all unless
>> > you were planning on (or are currently) running NuPIC as a cloud-based
>> > software service. You may still do this, of course, but you would need
>> > to share your source code or come to Numenta for a commercial license.
>> >
>> > I am happy to discuss any concerns, questions, or comments anyone has
>> > about this change.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > ---------
>> > Matt Taylor
>> > OS Community Flag-Bearer
>> > Numenta
>>
>
>

Reply via email to