thank you for your reply.

I have some data which contain coordinate and the date is attached by this 
mail. I have searched almost all the documents, but can not find any 
information about how to edit the search_def.josn file to make the opf use the 
CoordianteEncoder to encode the input data. The fields I want to predict is the 
coordiante (x,y,z), the predictionSteps is 1. And how to edit the 
search_def.json file?

Weiru Zeng



------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????: "Matthew Taylor";<[email protected]>;
????????: 2015??11??17??(??????) ????6:48
??????: "Weiru Zeng"<[email protected]>; 

????: Re: Question about running swarming



There are many reasons you may be getting a bad prediction. One major
reason could be that the data is not predictable.

By the way, you can run the exact experiment you're trying with a very
simple Menorah script:
https://gist.github.com/rhyolight/d9342c4f0ada961ee406

You just need to "pip install menorah" first.

When I ran, I got the following from the swarm:

Field Contributions:
{   u'chicago-beach-water-quality Calumet Beach turbidity': 13.665743305632503,
    u'chicago-beach-water-quality Calumet Beach water_temperature':
10.618651892890124,
    u'chicago-beach-water-quality Calumet Beach wave_height': 4.709141274238225,
    u'chicago-beach-water-quality Calumet Beach wave_period':
16.712834718374882,
    u'timestamp_dayOfWeek': 15.050784856879035,
    u'timestamp_timeOfDay': -11.04578340758864,
    u'timestamp_weekend': 0.0}

These numbers are rather low, which tells us that wave_period may not
be very predictable.

---------
Matt Taylor
OS Community Flag-Bearer
Numenta


On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Weiru Zeng <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi nupic:
>
> Recent I used the nupic to make prediction, and I attached my data  and the
> .json file  with this email. Run the swarming with my code and data, you
> will find the low constribution of the field, and it makes a bad prediction.
> My question is below:
>
> First: Is the bad predicion caused by my .json file?
> Second: The low contribution of all the fields means that the feature in the
> data is not enough to make a good prediction. Is that right?
> Last: This is about the .json file. I found that there is a item named
> "aggregation" in some other .json file, the detail is below:
>
> "aggregation": {
>       "hours": 1,
>       "microseconds": 0,
>       "seconds": 0,
>       "fields": [
>         [
>           "consumption",
>           "sum"
>         ],
>         [
>           "gym",
>           "first"
>         ],
>         [
>           "timestamp",
>           "first"
>         ]
>       ],
>       "weeks": 0,
>       "months": 0,
>       "minutes": 0,
>       "days": 0,
>       "milliseconds": 0,
>       "years": 0
>     }
>
> I atempted to set it, but fieled. I want to know what's the means of the
> time and the fields?. When should I set the time to 1, and how to set the
> "fields"?.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Weiru Zeng

Attachment: 13.csv
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to