Casper, have you seen this? It explains how our anomaly "likelihood"
code works, which is something like a moving average (but a bit more).

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVCKjZWYavM

---------
Matt Taylor
OS Community Flag-Bearer
Numenta


On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Cas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello NuPIC,
>
> The wiki page on anomaly scores mentions that some cases call for the use of
> a moving average on the raw anomaly score[1]. However, it does not mention
> examples in which this is used. I would like to know more about applications
> using a moving average of the anomaly score.
>
> I'm experimenting with custom generated datasets. In the datasets that I
> added randomized noise to, the predictions are impressive, but sometimes
> seem 'too perfect'. For example, the prediction will be a little off, but it
> will follow the spikes caused by noisiness impeccably.
>
> By contrast, a dataset without noise and a seemingly clearcut pattern will
> result in a gradual breakdown of the prediction, where it will start
> switching values in consecutive steps, or spiking to an extreme prediction
> in the middle of following the pattern accurately.
>
> With regards,
>
> Casper Rooker
> [email protected]
>
> [1]:
> https://github.com/numenta/nupic/wiki/Anomaly-Detection-and-Anomaly-Scores#results

Reply via email to