Python 3 would be nice, but I don't think it's a priority as most developers have already been forced to install both Python 2 and 3 anyway. I don't know about GCC, but the nupic.core in C++ project should convince people worried about nupic's performance, and will open gates to other language bindings which in turn will attract even more developers.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Marek Otahal <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> PS: Sorry to hijack the thread, but I have some inquiry about the newer >> technologies. What is the status of GCC 4.9/5+, python 3.x? Any active >> plans, or not an issue for now? > > > Mark, I changed the subject line of this email, which will break this off > into a new thread. Feel free to do the same in the future. > > We have no plans on moving to Python 3, and I have not heard any talk > about GCC for a long time. I just want the majority of users to be able to > install NuPIC. If we think moving to later versions of these things will > help that, I would support it. > > --------- > Matt Taylor > OS Community Flag-Bearer > Numenta >
