Hi Paulo!
Right now users can upload, analyse and share their data and analysis with others. We didn't put the option to 'fetch' pubic data as a feature. But let me know if you are interested in that ;)
Yep, that's actually what I'd like to see :)

Neurosurgery is a 'champion' user of Diffusion MRI and tractography. White matters tracts are a tangible usage of the 3d maps, since it allows for presurgical planning of tumor ressection for instance, and also integrate surgical navigation systems with these maps, to GPS guide the surgery.
Didn't think yet of DMRI (although I love the images they create) but in future, if it works, I will definitely try with these too!

I wonder if the 'time resolution' of the data. How nupic handles 'low frequency' time points?
Good question (which I can't still reply to, considering I haven't tried to fetch data from the Surgical Nav System yet).
I'll update you in future if I'm authorized to try this.

Thanks a lot for your help.

Raf

On 24/01/2016 20:16, Paulo Rodrigues wrote:
Hi Raf,

Right now users can upload, analyse and share their data and analysis with others. We didn't put the option to 'fetch' pubic data as a feature. But let me know if you are interested in that ;)

Neurosurgery is a 'champion' user of Diffusion MRI and tractography. White matters tracts are a tangible usage of the 3d maps, since it allows for presurgical planning of tumor ressection for instance, and also integrate surgical navigation systems with these maps, to GPS guide the surgery.


I think the interesting challenge in what you describe is the combination of the 2 points:

1. imaging (MRI, microscopy, etc) to get quantified and quantifiable features about the tissue

2. CNNs and nupic to predict the growth growth, where it will attack next to give the 'coordinates' of where and how to treat it to prevent nasty consequences.

I wonder if the 'time resolution' of the data. How nupic handles 'low frequency' time points?

Cheers,
Paulo

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Raf <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Paulo!

    Thanks a lot for the link (www.mint-labs.com
    <http://www.mint-labs.com>). I didn't know about your company but
    it looks like you're running a really wicked project! I'd love to
    test the beta for the 3d visualization.
    I registered to mint-labs but I couldn't see how I can download
    your data (I'm also interesting in machine learning myself) - is
    there maybe some link I didn't check?

    I also noticed that you apply your mlearning techniques to other
    neurologically interesting exams, such as EEG, MEG and PET: that's
    fantastic.

    I'm aware that in the ward where I'm doing my internship as an
    undergrad surgeons tend to use a C-Arm (something like this
    
http://usa.healthcare.siemens.com/clinical-specialities/surgery/surgical-disciplines/neurosurgery)
    for both spinal and brain surgery: for example in the case of some
    aggressive brain tumor, such as a blastoma, a common combo would
    be C-Arm + Surgical Navigation System (something like this
    
http://www.medtronic.com/for-healthcare-professionals/products-therapies/neurological/surgical-navigation-and-imaging/neurosurgery-imaging-and-surgical-navigation/
    , which essentially is a supercool GPS where the Earth is the
    brain and the hand of the surgeon are like satellites) +
    5-aminolevulinic acid (for fluorescence guide surgery) +
    microscope (of course).

    Unfortunately, pretty often, the 5-ala is not able to impregnate
    well enough the totality of the cancerous cells, which of course
    means that the surgeon can't distinguish them from the healthy
    tissue and, consequentially, not being able to remove them all,
    their presence could result in a tumoral relapse.
    Considering that both the microscope (live) and the C-Arm
    (whenever the surgeons uses it) return an imagine with potentially
    a decent resolution, do you think it would be mad to try to
    attempt to see how some convolutional neural network would perform
    against 5-ala in detecting healthy and cancerous tissue?

    My idea would be this:

    - CNNs/RNNs --> to analyze the bare "screenshot" (or frames)
    coming from the microscope and the C-Arm;

    - NuPIC "GPS" System --> to be adapted for the coordinates given
    by the Surgical Navigation System and trying to predict where
    potentially the tumors "goes" (certain tumors have really nasty
    shapes and there are really tiny little cellular lines that
    squeeze into distant part of the brain - same thing goes for
    certain spinal tumors).

    Would this seem possible to do?

    I'm sorry if I had to give these kind of basic explanations but I
    did it in order to keep the topic interesting and relevant for
    other people who may read this email that maybe are not familiar
    with the topic :)

    Thanks,
    Raf



    On 15/01/2016 20:42, Paulo Rodrigues wrote:
    Hi.

    Yes, MRI (and especially brain MRI) provides 'static' images -
    either showing the structure as gray matter or white matter (like
    from diffusion MRI) or other modalities.
    But if you want a time series on it I would say fMRI is more
    interesting, as it measures 'brain activity' as a proxy from the
    blood oxygenations, i.e. if part of the brain is working more, it
    is consuming more energy, so it needs more blood. fMRI is
    discussable, or better the conclusion that are drawn from it,
    especially in the task based studies.

    Now what is particularly of interest and cool is resting state
    fMRI <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resting_state_fMRI> - the
    subject is not doing any task, simply resting in the scanner, and
    the brain is 'fluctuating' in it's "idle mode". And then you can
    do cool stuff like look at the brain as a network, and as a
    dynamic network. This is being actively researched as a predictor
    for pathologies, cognition, etc etc - and it also has some nice
    connections with philosophy :) It has difficulties in the
    possibilities of analysis methods and pre-processing it, but
    depending on your brother's research needs, something can be done
    more or less complex.

    We have bunch of data if you need. Just let me know.

    Have a great weekend!
    Paulo

    ᐧ

    On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Matthew Taylor <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Mark, Marion, or Kentaro might have something to say abou
        this. Also, here are some examples of similar projects:

        -
        
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzfTZhd6X9c&index=12&list=PL3yXMgtrZmDqZc2m7qI3Kkbmxechp2-Zs
        -
        
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ij4StdJBxEo&index=17&list=PL3yXMgtrZmDqZc2m7qI3Kkbmxechp2-Zs


        ---------
        Matt Taylor
        OS Community Flag-Bearer
        Numenta

        On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:09 PM, gideon isaac
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            I was looking at some of the audio applications of Nupic
            provided by a helpful person on this list, and I think
            the same methods could be used for an MRI application.
            Static MRI pictures are constructed from Fourier
            transforms of a signal produced by Hydrogen atoms
            spinning under the influence of MRI magnets. They are
            then converted into a picture.  So temporal is converted
            to spatial or vice versa.  I’m somewhat muddled on this,
            but my brother creates sequences for MRI machines and
            then gathers the data coming out, and I want to interest
            him in Nupic.
            MRI static pictures are usually used to look for
            anomalies like tumors, or soft tissue problems that do
            not show up on x-rays.  It might be hard to compare a
            pathology picture with a healthy picture because people
            vary in height and shape etc.  That could be a problem –
            there is no standard picture of a lung for instance – you
            would have to feed pictures from people of all sizes into
            the HTM.
            There would be no need for a step of converting the
            signal to a picture, instead the signal would be fed
            directly into Nupic.
            There is also Functional-MRI – which can watch movements
            – you can watch a MRI movie of a heart beating and look
            for anomalies there.
            So is this something I can present to my brother’s
            research team at his university, and if so,  are there
            any special methods that should be used?
            Thanks.





-- *Paulo Rodrigues, PhD
    CEO & co-founder
    */Arc de Sant Silvestre 4, entresuelo segunda
    08003 Barcelona, Spain
    Tel. +34 933 282 007 <tel:%2B34%20933%20282%20007>
    Mob. +34 633 817 514 <tel:%2B34%20633%20817%20514>
    /[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    www.mint-labs.com <http://www.mint-labs.com>

-- Raf

    www.madraf.com/algotrading <http://www.madraf.com/algotrading>
    reply to:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    skype: algotrading_madraf




--
*Paulo Rodrigues, PhD
CEO & co-founder
*/Arc de Sant Silvestre 4, entresuelo segunda
08003 Barcelona, Spain
Tel. +34 933 282 007
Mob. +34 633 817 514
/[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
www.mint-labs.com <http://www.mint-labs.com>

--
Raf

www.madraf.com/algotrading
reply to: [email protected]
skype: algotrading_madraf

Reply via email to