Unfortunately I do not use the latest versions of NUT, the driver I created, solis, was changed, not by me, and now does not work on my nobreak, which I used to create the driver.
greetings Silvino B. Magalhaes Em qua, 19 de jun de 2019 às 03:39, Manuel Wolfshant < [email protected]> escreveu: > On 6/19/19 5:59 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > > > “The 62-nut-usbups.rules file looks pretty standard. Do you know if the > changes to 42-usb-hd-pm.rules are needed? It seems like none of the USB > devices would have the right permissions if 62-nut-usbups.rules isn't > sufficient (though this happened in Debian once).” > > My means of testing wasn’t the most rigorous, but I did try to use variable > isolation with these changes and some other changes. I could not make the > drops stop without having all 3 of these changes present. I believe a web > search lead me to this udev rule so I’ll dig up the link for context. > > This is starting to make sense, though. The link would be helpful, but no > worries if you can't find it. > > I think you mentioned the CentOS version - which kernel version does that > run? ("uname -r" is probably sufficient) > > > > CentOS 7x uses RedHat's idea of 3.10.0 .. which means it's a heavily > patched 3.10. And by heavily I mean that in the 4 years since RHEL 7 was > released, they added tons ( literally thousands ) of backports from 4.xx, > including from 4.18 > > Latest available kernel in the CentOS 7.6 line is 3.10.0-957.21.2 but > today we will probably release 3.10.0-957.21.3 which includes the fix for > TCP SACK. > > The public beta of RHEL 7.7 uses 3.10.0-1049 but 7.7 GA will certainly use > a newer release. I have already in use a beta of 3.10.0-1055 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nut-upsdev mailing list > [email protected] > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
