Dear Jim I'm Massimo and together with Elio that is in CC we are following the 
development of the Riello UPS drivers.

Elio has made a change on the source to fix a problem with our small UPS IDG 
400 that are also listed on the official Github issues list.

Seems that the Elio modification where not pushed on the standard source 
repository.

So can you tell us how to fix and make the modification active on the latest 
sources?

For any question don't hesitate to contact us.

I take the opportunity to with you a safe and happy Season Holidays.

Massimo Zampieri

Technical Marketing- Single Phase UPS & Software Product Manager
RPS SpA
Viale Europa, 7
37045 Legnago VR Italy
Tel. +39 0442 635807 Fax. +39 0442 635107 Mobile: +39 335 7170247
Skype ID: massimozampieri
mailto:[email protected]
http://www.riello-ups.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per favore non stampare questo messaggio se proprio non è 
necessario 
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
--------------------------------------------------------------------------




-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Elio Parisi 
Inviato: mercoledì 14 marzo 2018 17:37
A: [email protected]
Oggetto: R: [Nut-upsdev] [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong values & not 
powering off (#530)

Hi Charles,
thanks to the configuration files of the customer, we should have been found 
the problem. 
Attach the patch inclusive of this problem and the previous (including in the 
previous patch).

Should we post this patch also on the discussion on GitHub or it's up to you?

Thanks and let me know,


-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Charles Lepple [mailto:[email protected]]
Inviato: mercoledì 7 marzo 2018 01:27
A: Elio Parisi <[email protected]>
Cc: nut-upsdev Nut Developer Mailing List <[email protected]>
Oggetto: Re: [Nut-upsdev] [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong values & 
not powering off (#530)

On Feb 26, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Elio Parisi <[email protected]> wrote:
>       -       the second problem I think is related to the first because the 
> shutdown command that I sent to UPS by NUT monitor works without problems;

Can you please weigh in on the discussion on GitHub?

https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnetworkupstools%2Fnut%2Fissues%2F530%23issuecomment-370947318&data=01%7C01%7Ce.parisi%40riello-ups.com%7Cf5638ce97f4e43bace0108d583c216ac%7Cd8fd0d398b2f4760af9e84aadb8587ef%7C0&sdata=Foj6nMjKbRfS0kkKsUpYuZ9241r%2FVZxefovnGcgRmz4%3D&reserved=0

Attachment: riello.diff.gz
Description: riello.diff.gz

--- Begin Message ---



Da: Niels Møldrup [mailto:[email protected]]
Inviato: lunedì 21 dicembre 2020 18:40
A: Elio Parisi <[email protected]>
Oggetto: Riello IDG400





I have been strugling with Riello IDG400 not shutting down as expected using 
the Nut-server open source driver riello_usb.



Since i would really prefer to use the open source driver, would it be possible 
for you to push the update according to this soon to be 3  years old post?



[Nut-upsdev] R: [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong values & not powering 
off (#530) 
(alioth-lists.debian.net)<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Falioth-lists.debian.net%2Fpipermail%2Fnut-upsdev%2F2018-February%2F007374.html&data=04%7C01%7Ce.parisi%40riello-ups.com%7Cf48aba3938b844aa5a4108d8a5d781b3%7Cd8fd0d398b2f4760af9e84aadb8587ef%7C0%7C0%7C637441692307997749%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=oHOoHZX%2BnUHBuYxcRjiMOHlTnZLnTibfPsJamd4axLY%3D&reserved=0>



Best regards



Niels








--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Nut-upsdev 
[mailto:nut-upsdev-bounces+e.parisi=riello-ups....@lists.alioth.debian.org] Per 
conto di [email protected]
Inviato: martedì 27 febbraio 2018 13:02
A: [email protected]
Oggetto: Nut-upsdev Digest, Vol 151, Issue 8

Send Nut-upsdev mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.alioth.debian.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnut-upsdev&data=01%7C01%7Ce.parisi%40riello-ups.com%7C0cc07716ed164db4dd6c08d57dd9eb62%7Cd8fd0d398b2f4760af9e84aadb8587ef%7C0&sdata=wI0tulS9KPo8hhGo0%2BGwyMZs0mAYPC7salQ41MOlyrM%3D&reserved=0
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of Nut-upsdev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong values & not
      powering off (#530) (Charles Lepple)
   2. R: [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong values & not
      powering off (#530) (Elio Parisi)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:56:21 -0500
From: Charles Lepple <[email protected]>
To: Elio Parisi <[email protected]>
Cc: nut-upsdev Nut Developer Mailing List
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsdev] [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong
        values & not powering off (#530)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii

On Feb 26, 2018, at 4:58 AM, Elio Parisi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Charles,
> this type of UPS doesn't support realtime autonomy calculation, instead a 
> fixed countdown must be used.
>
> How we can fix non supported values?

If a value is not supported, the driver should not publish it with the dstate 
API. Dhould the driver be modified to not return battery.charge if the UPS 
returns 0xFF? Are there other variables that are affected?

(I don't think the IDG400 is covered in the protocol documentation that the NUT 
project received a while back.)
>
> For the point number 2, as we know NUT perfomrs the shutdown after battery 
> low signal with a delay of 5 seconds as specified in the FINALDELAY.
> Is this correct?

Right, NUT tells the computer to shut down, but it also typically sends a 
shutdown signal to the UPS. Does the IDG400 also respond to the same shutdown 
command as others?





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:06:11 +0000
From: Elio Parisi <[email protected]>
To: nut-upsdev Nut Developer Mailing List
        <[email protected]>
Subject: [Nut-upsdev] R: [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong
        values & not powering off (#530)
Message-ID:
        
<db6pr0701mb24558b56f4106aa37d05b7a7a4...@db6pr0701mb2455.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi Charles,
attached there is a patch for a new version of riello drivers:

Changes:

        -       small changes in riello_usb.c and riello_ser that solved 
problem with UPS that not support realtime autonomy calculation (and also 
internal temperature);
        -       the second problem I think is related to the first because the 
shutdown command that I sent to UPS by NUT monitor works without problems;

Cheers,
Elio Parisi.

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Charles Lepple [mailto:[email protected]]
Inviato: luned? 26 febbraio 2018 14:56
A: Elio Parisi <[email protected]>
Cc: nut-upsdev Nut Developer Mailing List <[email protected]>
Oggetto: Re: [networkupstools/nut] Riello IDG400 wrong values & not powering 
off (#530)

On Feb 26, 2018, at 4:58 AM, Elio Parisi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Charles,
> this type of UPS doesn't support realtime autonomy calculation, instead a 
> fixed countdown must be used.
>
> How we can fix non supported values?

If a value is not supported, the driver should not publish it with the dstate 
API. Dhould the driver be modified to not return battery.charge if the UPS 
returns 0xFF? Are there other variables that are affected?

(I don't think the IDG400 is covered in the protocol documentation that the NUT 
project received a while back.)
>
> For the point number 2, as we know NUT perfomrs the shutdown after battery 
> low signal with a delay of 5 seconds as specified in the FINALDELAY.
> Is this correct?

Right, NUT tells the computer to shut down, but it also typically sends a 
shutdown signal to the UPS. Does the IDG400 also respond to the same shutdown 
command as others?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: riello.diff.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 593 bytes
Desc: riello.diff.gz
URL: 
<https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.alioth.debian.org%2Fpipermail%2Fnut-upsdev%2Fattachments%2F20180226%2Ffb06b665%2Fattachment-0001.bin&data=01%7C01%7Ce.parisi%40riello-ups.com%7C0cc07716ed164db4dd6c08d57dd9eb62%7Cd8fd0d398b2f4760af9e84aadb8587ef%7C0&sdata=%2Bhs6It78eBOeoylfc0JwUJ%2BQJhI%2FNkRM9YxoV%2BFhP60%3D&reserved=0>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.alioth.debian.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnut-upsdev&data=01%7C01%7Ce.parisi%40riello-ups.com%7C0cc07716ed164db4dd6c08d57dd9eb62%7Cd8fd0d398b2f4760af9e84aadb8587ef%7C0&sdata=wI0tulS9KPo8hhGo0%2BGwyMZs0mAYPC7salQ41MOlyrM%3D&reserved=0

------------------------------

End of Nut-upsdev Digest, Vol 151, Issue 8
******************************************

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev

Reply via email to