That is terminology from Computer Science.  (Decades ago?)  It is familiar.  
Not invented by Cisco.  As in, producer-consumer, from the same time.  Those 
were all different paradigms for client-server relationships.  There must be 
Wikipedia citations that can be consulted.  As I recall, there were 
distinctions, such as, producer-consumer were tightly bound, where the producer 
had no purpose without a consumer.  In publisher-subscriber, subscribers 
registered their interest in what the publisher had to say, but were neither 
required to exist at all, or might ignore what was being published.

Larry Baker
US Geological Survey
650-329-5608
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



On Mar 12 2021, at 7:22:35 PM, Douglas Parsons 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I didn't go there due to its use by Cisco.

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:03 PM Baker, Lawrence M via Nut-upsuser 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:
Jim,

The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is 
publisher-subscriber.

Larry Baker
US Geological Survey
650-329-5608
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



On Mar 12 2021, at 6:24:38 PM, Phil Stracchino via Nut-upsuser 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:



This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking 
on links, opening attachments, or responding.



On 3/12/21 9:14 PM, Rusty Bower wrote:
Manager/subscriber seems most accurate

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 12, 2021, at 20:13, Douglas Parsons 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


In place of secondary how about subscriber? It would be accurate to
the role.


I'd been going to suggest controller and ... something.  Controller and
subscriber?


--
 Phil Stracchino
 Babylon Communications
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 Landline: +1.603.293.8485
 Mobile:   +1.603.998.6958

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Falioth-lists.debian.net%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnut-upsuser&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cbaker%40usgs.gov%7C02f93786357b4c8628c808d8e5c99173%7C0693b5ba4b184d7b9341f32f400a5494%7C0%7C0%7C637512001184607208%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=aR0FjsOcr6yUjWZzRIKVSLlhF%2BDXVn%2F84CZ4%2Br3Dvqo%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Falioth-lists.debian.net%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnut-upsuser&data=04%7C01%7Cbaker%40usgs.gov%7Cb01ce3a796ae4eac503b08d8e5cf4b28%7C0693b5ba4b184d7b9341f32f400a5494%7C0%7C0%7C637512025774162066%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=BUrriooegO%2BufxvgamwuSSYbbACoc4R5Bn4W2N7qaFs%3D&reserved=0>

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Falioth-lists.debian.net%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnut-upsuser&data=04%7C01%7Cbaker%40usgs.gov%7Cb01ce3a796ae4eac503b08d8e5cf4b28%7C0693b5ba4b184d7b9341f32f400a5494%7C0%7C0%7C637512025774162066%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=BUrriooegO%2BufxvgamwuSSYbbACoc4R5Bn4W2N7qaFs%3D&reserved=0>

_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev

Reply via email to