Hello all, During discussions in several recent tickets, I've (re?)discovered that NUT codebase is not overly consistent with use of status names (e.g. `!OL` instead of `OB` in some cases), and we seem to lack a consistent approach to "ECO mode" as well (whatever vendors might mena by that, what NUT reflects it as and whether/how it shows up in the status or can be or not be managed from SW to HW).
* https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2495 * https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2496 Insights and inputs would be welcome, not in the least to standardize on a status and command name approach that would best suit the mix of different vendors' concepts. Thanks in advance, Jim Klimov
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
