Hello all, During an issue discussion I began wondering why we don't report any sort of last-update timestamp that consumers could read and decide whether to process the rest of info, for example (similar to HTTP-304). Then I thought it might be unsafe to expose a server timestamp, or service uptime, generally nowadays (especially with NUT read-only access being anonymous) - so it should be hidden by default and only users who want/need the data can enable their drivers to report it (troubleshooting, development, secure LAN...) - and then there's more specific info we could show, like the age of each reading individually.
One of the hardest IT problems then rears its head - namely Naming :) I posted some ideas I've had about this at https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2810 and invite you to share your thoughts here or there. WDYT? Jim Klimov
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
