Hi Arnaud, Arnaud Quette a écrit : > > strange: hal is set to "no" by default, and snmp to "auto" (meaning > that if you have everything needed, it will be set to "yes", and "no" > otherwise). > So I would be interested in seeing the error log.
Well I haven't kept trace of what I exactly did, but this might relate to my inexperience building debian packages or obscurely missing dependancies ;-) After I failed compiling manually ;-) I then tried to follow your advice and build a .deb in a more automated way ;-) so I did a « use the 2.2.2 source, "ln -s packaging/debian && debuild -us -uc" » per your advice. Here it complained about some missing building dependancies which I installed. Then I retried "debuild -us -uc" but now it complained about a missing ".orig.tar.gz" tarball. Then I read the debuild manpage ;-) and tried as suggested in the example "debuild -i -us -uc -b" Then it compiled allright, but failed building the package complaining that a complete directory structure was missing in the dummy "usr/share/doc/blah/bloh..." where it was trying to move files. So I created manually the missing destination dirs and restarted the process, it seemed to work this time and I ended up with a nice set of 2.2.2 .deb packages, which I installed on my system... ...only to discover that the packages were nice but all the binaries were missing inside : the "nut" package contained barely documentation files, argh, sigh ! Then I uninstalled and purged the whole damned thing and reinstalled the previous nice working 2.0.5. Ubuntu Gutsy binary packages :-D Well, I may have to work a little on Debian packages building :-} _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
