hi there, 2008/8/21 Tomáš Smetana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:34:18 +0200 (CEST) > "Arjen de Korte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > You are correct, I have let myself be totally misled by the Fedora >> > packaging, which I followed. It not only packages the hal-addons in >> > one package with all the other drivers. >> >> That is bad... :-( >> > > Oh, no... This is entirely my fault, I should have read the docs. Alfred, if > you don't have a Red Hat Bugzilla account I will file the bug myself. Sorry > for the problems I caused.
thanks for stepping up Tomáš. you should have a look at the Debian and Suse packages as an example. Note that I'm sure about the former, but I haven't confirmed the latter (but it's Arjen's work, so I'm confident) If you have any doubt or question, don't hesitate to contact me. About the HAL package, Richard Hughes will surely be interesting in beta testing this ;-) btw, can you also take care of keeping the packaging/redhat directory in sync, so that we can go ahead with the "make package" rule, and the build system? thanks, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - MGE Office Protection Systems - http://www.mgeops.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
