Citeren Charles Lepple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Note that this is the same VID/PID as on this example on the Lakeview > Research home page: > > http://www.lvr.com/usb_on_a_budget.htm > > We can include the name "Lakeview Research" in the documentation, but > we shouldn't lead people astray here.
Another thing, loosely related to this, is how we are going to deal with the 'generic' VID:PID combinations in some of the USB drivers, for example the megatec_usb and (new) blazer_usb drivers. At present, in the megatec_usb driver we have several VID:PID combinations for USB-to-serial converters that are commonly found in UPSes. But what happens if other totally unrelated (non-UPS) devices use the same controllers? Or that kernel level support becomes available for them? Unless a VID:PID combination unambiguously identifies a USB device as a supported UPS, using it in a HAL addon is probably not a very good idea. Should we remove the 'hald-addon-megatec_usb' driver before releasing nut-2.4? Best regards, Arjen -- Please keep list traffic on the list _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
