On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Kjell Claesson <[email protected]> wrote: > Den Sunday 21 December 2008 18.08.07 skrev Charles Lepple: > Hi Charles, > Sorry for the delay but I have to check things out and make some builds. >> Is this a released version of NUT, or from SVN? (If SVN, which revision?) > > This is from svn revision 1665. I have made an svn ebuild so i build directly > from svn. Running 64bit gentoo system.
Hmm, it's been a long time since I worked with a 64-bit system. > But i checked, I have the segfault on the nut-2.2.2 stable build also. > >> >> > From /var/log/messages >> > Dec 21 17:32:50 sm6fhx upsd[21366]: segfault at 0 ip 0000000000408b6d sp >> >> If your upsd still has debugging symbols, you can try running >> 'addr2line -e /path/to/upsd 408b6d' > > This is strange. I have no debugging info but i built it with -g , but it > would > not give me anything but ??:0 as output. So i built it with -gstabs, and > guess what.... it does not segfault. Well, it sort of sounds like it might be related to the compiler - using a different debugging option shouldn't change how the code is generated, unless it isn't optimizing as much with -gstabs. If you still have the old build with just -g, do you get any symbols from 'nm upsd'? -- - Charles Lepple _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
