On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Arjen de Korte <[email protected]> wrote: > While adding the tcp_wrappers support, I also noticed that in many cases we > use both WITH_FOO (usually in Makefile.am) and HAVE_FOO (mostly in the > sources). > > Note that having something available, may not mean that it should be > configured with it. So in most cases, if we conditionally compile sources, > we should be testing against WITH_FOO instead of HAVE_FOO. As far as I can > see, the HAVE_FOO stuff should be replaced almost everywhere by WITH_FOO > except in configure.in, where the prerequisites for WITH_BAR may require the > presence of both HAVE_FOO and HAVE_BAR. > > Any thoughts?
Interesting, I hadn't noticed that. I wonder if it's just because packagers tend to enable almost everything? I don't have time to check into this now, but later this week I can dig up my autotools book and see if there's some other possible explanation. -- - Charles Lepple _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
