On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Arjen de Korte <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don't forget that the debugging options in NUT aren't meant to help Joe > User, it's to enable us (the developers) to get additional information on > why something isn't working as it should. Therefor, when asking Joe to > enable debugging, we should make it abundently clear what we want from him. > So don't tell him to 'enable debugging', but post the commandline to execute > on his system. I still think there is room for improvement. I concede that debugging output from multiple drivers would be a mess, but it wouldn't hurt to have debug level 1 or 2 print a message saying that they should 1) go to the nut-upsdev list for further guidance, and 2) when they ask for help, include the following full pathname of the driver. This wouldn't block the possibility of further debugging of upsdrvctl, and it eliminates one more round-trip email to verify where their drivers are located (since many packages don't put them in $PATH). -- - Charles Lepple _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
