Citeren Daniel O'Connor <[email protected]>:
OK, so it needs another entry for this particular UPS? I wonder if there is some more general way of detecting this particular implementation..
No. The problem here is that APC uses the same HID path in different ways. Since they also use a single VID:PID combination for all their devices, there is no easy way to tell when to use date_conversion() and when to use apc_date_conversion().
It is tempting to base this on the size of the field that is reported, but it would require a major amount of work on the base usbhid-ups driver, since we only pass the parameters by value and not by the full HID path information. Not that it isn't doable, but it takes much more work than I'm prepared to spend on a vendor that isn't really supportive with NUT.
Basically, I'm telling you that we probably won't fix this in the near future. Best regards, Arjen -- Please keep list traffic on the list _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
