Hi Michal, 2009/9/1 Arjen de Korte
> Citeren Michal Hlavinka > > We would like to use nss for cryptography instead of OpenSSL. Reason for >> this >> is mostly for FIPS 140 validation. >> >> See: >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CryptoConsolidationEval >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CryptoConsolidationScorecard >> >> also OpenSuSE prefers to use the nss for cryptography for the same reason >> ( >> http://en.opensuse.org/SharedCertStore ) >> > > The above makes lots of sense. > very interesting indeed! even more knowing that I was considering a gnutls port (mostly for licensing issues)... thanks a lot for these pointers ;-) > > Would it be possible to use nss instead of openssl? >> > > Most likely, yes. > > #ifdef blocks would be enough. I can prepare patches. What's your opinion? >> > > I would certainly welcome an effort to standardize here, so please provide > patches if you have any available. Preferably for the SVN trunk version, but > if you only have them for older versions, I could probably port them to the > latest version. > seconded, your work here would be very much appreciated. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
