Arjen de Korte ha scritto:
Citeren Marco Chiappero <[email protected]>:A possible sample configuration could be: [globalups] driver = mgensm-ups port = parallel minimum = 1
[...]
The 'minimum' parameter and redundancy is something that should be dealt with in the client(s), not the driver. This is where the NSM approach currently breaks.
No, the minimum is an optional parameter, not exactly the same meaning of MINSUPLIES, it can be removed if you don't like it. The approach is not broken, it is not the smarter one, but it is not broken. Sorry but I'm getting bored with this discussion, I would prefer be told that you do not want to include such code (which is not a problem) instead of reading sometimes pointless objections. The subdriver solution is not going to break backward compatibility or something else, while the driver approach would provide almost full NMC support to NUT without much pain. They do both integrates quite correctly in the current NUT structure, even though with possible limitations. I think I could save much more time abandoning this idea (and discussion) and spending only a couple of minutes in applying my patch that just work and do what I want, easily and smartly... which is still better than no support at all.
Regards, Marco _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
