On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
2010/2/12 Arjen de Korte <[email protected]>:
Citeren Arnaud Quette <[email protected]>:
If nobody objects within 24 hours, I will tag and release 2.4.2-
pre1.
Do we really need tags for this? In recent history, we have seen
little to
no responses to the -pre releases. Can't we just direct people to a
specific
SVN revision? Or even better, provide them with a link to a tarball
that
they can use?
that makes sense! I'll reserve tags for final release.
from now on, the "-pre" cycle will only consist in freezing for a
week.
as usual, this is limited to non invasive changes.
having a symlink to the latest buildbot tarball would help.
@Charles: can you please recall me the situation on that point?
It really should be a redirect rather than a symlink, so that the
filename reflects the revision. I haven't had time to look into
implementing that.
On the other hand, the whole purpose of a freeze is to test a specific
version, so I think it makes sense to say "test the tarball at this
specific URL".
Using the '[help]' link at the bottom of the waterfall, it is possible
to customize the list of builds. The following URL limits the list to
trunk builds with tarballs:
http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/waterfall?branch=trunk&builder=Debian-etch-x86&reload=none
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
