Hello All, Do we have any more concerns or suggestions related to adding "device.part" nut variable?
Thanks & Regards, Chetan Agarwal > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Lepple [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 7:23 PM > To: Arnaud Quette > Cc: Agarwal, Chetan; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Nut-upsdev] Request to add new nut variable to get device > part number > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Arnaud Quette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I second Chetan: > > the part number can somehow be considered as the serial number. > > that is to say, an information that: > > - can be needed for support situations, > > - can help managing large systems, using NUT to feed a CMDB (1) system. > > > > Considering that some big names (like Dell) are starting to join, this > is > > the kind of details that will help us in rallying such companies. > > I agree that this information is useful, but I don't think we're ready > to add this. There is some cleanup that needs to be done first: > namely, cmdvartab still only lists the ups.* names (no mention of > device.*), and we are spread fairly thin on documentation updates. > > Can we just #ifdef that variable out for now, and add it in once the > AsciiDoc branch has been merged (assuming we reach consensus)? > > -- > - Charles Lepple _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
