On lun., 2010-12-20 at 18:32 +0300, Paul Fertser wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:53:29PM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote: > > and everything seems to work (i've to admit nut.exe didn't get built > > for whatever obscure autoconf reason while halt.exe compiled all > > right). > > From: Paul Fertser <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:28:34 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH] (Semi-)properly specify dependencies for nut.exe > > EXTRA_nut_DEPENDENCIES would be even better alas Debian testing's > automake is too old. > --- > scripts/Windows/Makefile.am | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/Windows/Makefile.am b/scripts/Windows/Makefile.am > index b2d70f1..a1e4b81 100644 > --- a/scripts/Windows/Makefile.am > +++ b/scripts/Windows/Makefile.am > @@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ winevent.dll: winevent.o > > bin_PROGRAMS = nut halt > > -nut$(EXEEXT): winevent.dll > nut_SOURCES = wininit.c > nut_LDADD = ../../common/libcommon.la > +nut_DEPENDENCIES = winevent.dll $(nut_LDADD) > > halt_SOURCES = halt.c > > -- > 1.5.6.5 >
In fact it seems that we do not need winevent.dll at all. I thought an external DLL was mandatory for event log resources, but setting up nut.exe linked against winevent.o as the EventMessageFile in the registry base is working. So I have removed winevent.dll. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
