Hi John, 2011/1/17 John Bayly
> On 14/01/2011 20:40, Arnaud Quette wrote: > >> Author: aquette >> Date: Fri Jan 14 20:40:06 2011 >> New Revision: 2832 >> URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2832 >> >> +link: >> http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.6/nut-2.6.0.tar.gz.sig[signature] >> > May I suggest that you also provide checksums for the tarball? I'm updating > the FreeBSD port, and wanted to verify the SHA256 sum. As it's been > downloaded from the NUT website, I know the odds of the source being tainted > are astronomical, but if it's for a distribution, I thought I'd be extra > cautious. > As it is I've verified the GPG sig (never used it before) and used the > computed SHA sum. > I've added a SHA256 hash, and referenced it in the download section: http://www.networkupstools.org/download.html I've not yet updated the documentation, but it's simple as downloading the nut archive and the matching .sha256 file. Then using: $ sha256sum -c nut-2.6.0.tar.gz.sha256 You should get back: nut-2.6.0.tar.gz: OK thanks for your feedback, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
