Citeren Charles Lepple <[email protected]>:
This seems ambitious for a few months. Then again, there's the old quote about the person saying it can't be done shouldn't get in the way of the person who is making it happen :-)
Full ack. I'm not sure how much time I can spend on NUT, but especially the Windows port integration is something that makes me very uneasy. In its present state, I'm not too thrilled about the way it is integrated in the sources. It seems we're getting back to massive amounts of #if(n)def's in many critical parts of the code. I'd rather see this being integrated by putting the functions that are UNIX / Windows / other OS specific in separate modules and link in the appropriate version when we build the binaries.
[...]
* I would also propose that one of the first commits on a feature branch should be a little more description of the requirements, or design ideas.
I'd too like to see a roadmap (the announcement of 2.8.0 months before is a good starting point).
Best regards, Arjen -- Please keep list traffic on the list (off-list replies will be rejected) _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
