Charles Lepple wrote: > On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> IMHO, we only want NUT to claim these invalid USB IDs if the user > specifically requests it, rather than including it in the base NUT > distribution (think Gstreamer's "ugly" vs "good" plugins.) > > Arnaud, do you think it is worthwhile to split this off into a second > udev/hotplug configuration file? (I ask since I think either you or > someone else at Eaton wrote the script that generates the .rules.in > file). I cannot tell, what is better, not handle two strange UPSes by default and tell users what they should do, or add "daemon" group permission to a device with invalid id. (But the first will probably generate more bug reports.) -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: [email protected] Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +49 911 7405384547 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
