2011/11/25 Charles Lepple <[email protected]>: > > On Nov 25, 2011, at 4:36 AM, Arnaud Quette <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Charles, >> >> 2011/11/24 <[email protected]>: >>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Fedora-x64 while >>> building Network UPS Tools. >>> Full details are available at: >>> http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Fedora-x64/builds/453 >>> >>> Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/ >>> >>> Buildslave for this Build: pune-fc10-64bit >>> >>> Build Reason: The web-page 'force build' button was pressed by 'clepple': >>> >>> Build Source Stamp: [branch branches/Eaton_SDK] Testing >>> Blamelist: >>> >>> BUILD FAILED: failed svn >> >> thanks for pushing the build on this branch. >> >> wouldn't it be better to tie the testing of branch to "--revision >> HEAD", to be more generic? >> It still seem to be linked to 'Testing', which is not applicable >> anymore for long. >> > > I meant to leave the revision field blank. Next forced build was what I > intended to do.
so it build x86_64. BTW, I've noticed a compilation warning (implicit declaration of function ‘nut_ipmi_get_sensors_status’) that I've fixed in r3335... FYI, Fred has developed and tested this Eaton SDK on: - linux x86 and x86_64, - Windows x86 which is, at least, the current scope. Any comment from your side on a possible integration in the trunk? I'm too biased to consider my voice relevant here... cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
