On Dec 1, 2011, at 4:09 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > The other missing bit there is the version limitation, as for the > current Svn mechanism. > Currently, this script output the whole history, ending up with a 400 > Kb ChangeLog!
In the "git log" command line, append "v2.4.1..HEAD" (sans quotes) to only show history from v2.4.1 onwards. (That's approximately what svn2cl does - although it uses a revision that is a few hundred commits later.) > Other than that, I see no problem in shipping it with the sources > (tools/ dir), and the show stopper is fixed. > > Finally, I have a branch creation to happen (Powerchain), which I'm > retaining for some time. > What is the best: commit on Svn or wait a bit more for git? As long as you do a simple SVN branch creation, I think we're fine (remote "svn copy"). Depends when you want it to merge, I guess. _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
