2012/1/9 Charles Lepple <[email protected]> > On Jan 9, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > Hi Charles, > > > > 2012/1/8 Charles Lepple <[email protected]> > > > >> On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > >> > >>> # 4. Is the new_UIs-root tag still useful? It doesn't seem to point > >>> # at an actual branch. > >> > >> ESR: In terms of content, no - not useful. > >> > >> Arnaud: While nothing has been committed on this branch[*], this is a > good > >> reminder to check your development machines for any working copies with > >> uncommitted changes. > >> > >> [*] http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/log/branches/new_UIs > >> > > > > The actual work has been done in the trunk, on NUT Monitor. > > This branch goes back before this, and we can now delete it (which I've > > done in r3380) since I don't see any added value there. > > OK, thanks. > > > Note that I have a few things stagging for the "Powerchain" branch, which > > is not yet usable, but might be worth to commit. > > But since I don't want to interfere with the git transition, this can > wait > > a bit more... > > > It's still an incremental conversion at this point. It's up to you as to > whether you want to commit into SVN and check out later in Git, or generate > a tree-to-working-copy patch in SVN to apply to a new Git branch. The > latter method won't handle newly added files gracefully. >
well, it won't hurt to have it in a public branch instead of a local repo. I've so committed the Powerchain WIP on the branch (r3381). It will make things a bit easier, since I have to postpone its completion. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
