Hi Charles, please to see you jumping in ;-)
2012/2/8 Charles Lepple <[email protected]>: >> Do you know which SVN revision or NUT release your patch was originally >> based on? Possibly v2.4.3? > > Never mind, it was easy to merge by hand. A temporary branch is on GitHub: > > https://github.com/clepple/nut/commits/git-list_clients/ > > Arnaud: what do you think about the syslog-based client list, which is > included? I saw your comments proposing the protocol-based approach, but do > we need both? I guess it can't hurt, since someone would have to become the > 'nut' user to signal upsd. I don't think we need both, and I don't see any added value in having the syslog complement. René probably got me wrong, or simply merged his original code / idea with mine. that being said, it's nice from René to have done the work (thanks for that René, much appreciated). as he told, upsc implementation is still missing, to get the complete picture. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
