Came across this note in section 4.8 of the developers guide before
adding FSD to the driver:
Note
upsd injects "FSD" by itself following that command by a master
upsmon process. Drivers must not set that value.
Should I try it anyway as suggested?
Thanks,
Bill
At 08:13 AM 2/15/2012, Charles Lepple wrote:
On Feb 14, 2012, at 11:10 PM, William R. Elliot wrote:
OK. Totally missed that I could send FSD as a status from the
driver...sorry. I'll give that a shot.
Bill,
Not a problem. I think you are breaking new ground here, but it's
something that we should consider for other big UPS models.
Arnaud,
Have you had a chance to follow this discussion? Basically, it
sounds like we have a gap in the shutdown mechanism if NUT is set up
to monitor an UPS, but the force-shutdown command is sent to the UPS
by another system which is not the NUT master. This would probably
apply to Eaton's multi-user UPSes like those monitored by snmp-ups
and the XML-based cards.
top of the thread:
<http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%[email protected]%3E>http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c201202092250.q19MoEhE018871%40wreassoc.com%3e
--
Charles Lepple
clepple@gmail
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
