2012/11/20 Charles Lepple <[email protected]> > On Nov 19, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > > 2012/11/19 Charles Lepple <[email protected]> > >> On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote: >> >> Hi Charles, >> >> 2012/11/15 Charles Lepple <[email protected]> >> >>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: >>> >>> > Fix Buildbot failures on commit r3776 >>> >>> One small request in the commit messages: please mention exact commit >>> numbers only if the commit is hard to find. Something like "fix buildbot >>> failures from previous commit" is specific enough, without making the >>> reader look up a specific commit number. >>> >> >> ^ this is more for future reference than anything >> >> point taken
> right, sorry about that. I've made myself the exact same comment, but had >> no time until now to fix the msg. >> The summary line is now "Fix Buildbot failure on missing manual page", >> the rest is unchanged. >> >> >> Wait, where did you fix it? >> > > hem, sorry :-/ > I've fixed it directly on the server, as usual, using "svnadmin setlog". > but I can revert it easily if you prefer. > > ESR and I are trying to debug reposurgeon, and we typically use his >> 'svnpull' script to synchronize the local mirror of the SVN repository. >> svnpull uses svnsync, which I don't believe will detect direct >> modifications to the SVN repository. >> >> If you want to change a commit message, let us know and we'll add the >> change to the nut.box script here: >> https://gitorious.org/reposurgeon/nut-conversion/trees/master >> > > so, do you prefer that I rollback the msg, and you address it through > nut.box? > > > I went ahead and did a full svnsync just in case, so I should have your > updates. It's not that we *need* to do the changes through nut.box, but > that changing the repository directly can introduce discrepancies that are > hard to track down if we don't know about them. (Theoretically, two people > converting the NUT repository with reposurgeon should get exactly the same > Git commit IDs - assuming that the starting SVN repository is identical.) > understood, sorry again for the bad reflex! I'll have to fix some bad habits I took with svn, but already started to. > Whether you want to change it on the SVN side, or the reposurgeon side, > just let me know so I know to look out for that change. > svn r3777 header was fixed at the same time I sent my mail. so you and Eric should have a summary line without "r3776" reference. as told before, if you prefer that I revert this specific msg, just to be sure, and address it through nut.box, just tell me back cheers, Arnaud -- NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
