On 2012-12-19 23:15, Arnaud Quette wrote:
2012/12/5 Steffen Plotner <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> Hi, Hi Steffen and Michal Finally found it - the UPS on my side is APC020 (internal reference) > -----Original Message----- > From: Michal Soltys [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 4:22 AM > To: Steffen Plotner > Cc: nut-upsdev > Subject: apc / ap9612th questions > > Steffen - I have few questions regarding this ups/card combo.: > > > 1) How does the capability string looks like ? (^Z) SM #uD43132135138129uM43229234239224uA43110112114108uI43253264271280lD43103100097106lM43177172168182lA43090092081085lI43196188208204e44200155090oI43230240220225oD13115oJ13100oM13208s441HMLLq44202050710p443020180300600k4410TLNr443000060180300E443336168ON OFF > > 2) How does the string of supported commands look like ? (a) 3.!$%+?=#|.+-789>@ABCDEFGKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZ'abcefgjklmnopqrsuxyz~,1..+-HIJT[]ahitv{} > > 3) How do values for '[' ']' '{' '}' are enumerated when this card is > present ? I can see two choices: NO,NO NO,NO NO,NO NO,NO thanks for the data Steffen! @Michal: have you been able to finally address this long run point. I've quickly gone through your blast of commits (3802-3818) and have not seen obvious evidence of this...
Not pushed yet, it will be on top of the recent stuff. I have few minor things to adjust/prepare/test remaining.
Info provided by Steffen (thanks !) actually makes the thing easier than what I initially expected - as {} and [] are not reported in capabilities, so I don't have to handle any "multivalue" caps.
cheers, Arno -- NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
