On 11/8/2014 6:54 AM, thomas schorpp wrote:
Dear Ted,
Am 07.11.2014 um 17:47 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
On 11/3/2014 9:25 PM, thomas schorpp wrote:
Hi Ted,
Am 04.11.2014 um 04:12 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt:
Note that since the UPS relies on the voltage from the battery pack to
determine state of charge, it is quite useful to add in the battery
pack
voltage to the logs as such:
--- upslog.c.orig 2012-07-31 10:38:58.000000000 -0700
+++ upslog.c 2014-02-20 09:23:14.000000000 -0800
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
static flist_t *fhead = NULL;
#define DEFAULT_LOGFORMAT "%TIME @Y@m@d @H@M@S% %VAR battery.charge%
" \
+ "%VAR battery.voltage% %VAR output.current% " \
"%VAR input.voltage% %VAR ups.load% [%VAR ups.status%] " \
"%VAR ups.temperature% %VAR input.frequency%"
1. I see no need to patch a program for any parameter (-extension)
already handled:
$ upslog -f "%VAR battery.voltage%" -s [email protected] -l -
Network UPS Tools upslog 2.6.4
logging status of [email protected] to - (30s intervals)
writepid: fopen /var/run/nut/upslog.pid: Permission denied
25.90
25.90
^C25.90
Signal 2: exiting
$
$ upslog -f "%VAR battery.status.abm%" -s [email protected] -l -
Network UPS Tools upslog 2.6.4
logging status of [email protected] to - (30s intervals)
writepid: fopen /var/run/nut/upslog.pid: Permission denied
RS
RS
^CRS
Signal 2: exiting
$
Actually, it wasn't my intent that patch would go into the
distribution, it was my intent to help others who have these UPSes
still in service to get a better handle on their pecularities. But,
you actually bring up a great point. Why have ANY variables at all in
upslog?
I'm not PL so I don't decide what gets into production here and the
point simply was 1.) , intended to RFC the community of this general
developer practice Q,
but in no way to insult You in any way.
We should just have the output of upslog an empty log. And tell
users to specify ALL the parameters they want that are important to
them on the command line to upslog.
After all, selecting ANY parameters for default inclusion in upslog
must make us look like total know-it-all assholes, right?
I think that's what the logic your using is saying.
NACK. I just have "assumed":
And new defaults need PL and broader community consencus, I assume?
Yes. All users of upscode2 let's hear what they have to say.
You must have many upscode2 UPSes in service, Thomas. I congratulate
you as keeping these old units in service actually requires a lot of
knowledge of UPSes.
I should know as I have one in service :-| But since you have so many
more upscode2 UPSes in service you must have a much better knowledge of
whether the patch is a good one than I do.
I've seen a users list around here and I've never claimed anything above
after "I assume?" and since "it was my intent to help others who have
these UPSes"
maybe You already could have forwared such QA requests to that list.
Suggest You better patch the manpage first encouraging users reading
manpages ;-)
You seem very threatened by the suggestion to give users of the software
more information in the log that they can use.
No at all. You know what ";-)" means in the netslang? That was supposed
to be a friendly joke, sorry if You've lost any humor at work.
2. man upslog:
-i interval
Wait this many seconds between polls. This defaults to 30 seconds.
If you require tighter timing, you should write your own logger using
the upsclient(3) library.
30s are far to long to catch short but maybe damaging line power
incidents, so I would second that.
3. Maybe You shouldn't top post nor (re)word wrap mails to devlists,
thank You.
Ah. Thank you for posting what is REALLY bothering you. After all, no
need to actually make some reasonable explanations of your positions
when it's easier to criticize for some imagined slight given by putting
photons in a slightly different place on the screen. Much better
to reply with cryptically short responses that violate grammar rules and
require multiple rereads to even get a sense of what you might possibly
be talking about. After all those fuzzball routers just barely have
enough CPU available to pass the short emails.
Now I suppose your going to respond with that immature drivel that's
been floating around, lets see if I remember it:
Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>> Top-posting.
>>> What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Sorry, can't remember, citation and authentication missing.
We all must make sure our postings are formatted so your circa 1982
/bin/mail command can still read it <eyeroll>
Pardon, but the majority of OSS/Linux kernel devlists suggests not to
top post and there're good *mature* reasons why not.
As You can read in my headers I'm using Thunderbird and if a "You
shouldn't" proposal is "bothering" You, then I hereby apologize for my
bad English.
Hi Thomas,
Sorry, I didn't mean to come off so harsh, I don't have a cat but if
any of my USPes fell on one it would be a flat cat. :-) I
misinterpreted your post,
The upscode2 driver has been a PIA for me for years, or maybe it isn't
the driver but the UPS. Yeah, probably it's the UPS. Besides the
issues with underreporting the battery state of charge, the upscode2
driver periodically gets a no data response from the UPS. Beats me why
that is.
Ted
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
