Hi Arno, Thanks for your offer, though I'm really looking for a unit testing framework. :)
First dummy test is already up and running and I'm currently fighting with automake magic. Thanks, Nick On 28/04/15 14:59, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > 2015-04-27 15:02 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Nick Ma. <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > But it still doesn't compile any executable: ~/nut/tests% ls > > cpputest.cpp example.cpp Makefile Makefile.am Makefile.in > > I think it is only intended to produce an executable when running > "make check" or the dist* targets. > > > confirmed. Note that this is just a base framework for unit testing > that Emilien has setup. > Emilien may be able to elaborate more on this topic... > > A more comprehensive and system-oriented approach would be to use the > tests set available in Debian / Ubuntu: > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/nut.git/tree/debian/tests > > It tests a wide number of things, from IPv4 and v6 reachability, to > commands and settings, including shutdown (simulation). > > Note that I'm interested in having someone that could focus more on > the QA / Testing dimension. > So if you're interested in Nick, feel free to contact me ;) > > cheers, > Arno > -- > Eaton Data Center Automation - Opensource Leader > NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org > Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org > Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr > _______________________________________________ Nut-upsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
